By Craig Whitlock
Saturday, September 18, 2010; 9:39 PM
AT JOINT BASE LEWIS-MCCHORD, WASH. The U.S. soldiers hatched a plan as simple as it was savage: to randomly target and kill an Afghan civilian, and to get away with it . . .
* For weeks, according to Army charging documents, rogue members of a platoon from the 5th Stryker Combat Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, floated the idea. Then, one day last winter, a solitary Afghan man approached them in the village of La Mohammed Kalay. The "kill team" activated the plan.
One soldier created a ruse that they were under attack, tossing a fragmentary grenade on the ground. Then others opened fire.
According to charging documents, the unprovoked, fatal attack on Jan. 15 was the start of a months-long shooting spree against Afghan civilians that resulted in some of the grisliest allegations against American soldiers since the U.S. invasion in 2001. Members of the platoon have been charged with dismembering and photographing corpses, as well as hoarding a skull and other human bones.
The subsequent investigation has raised accusations about whether the military ignored warnings that the out-of-control soldiers were committing atrocities. The father of one soldier said he repeatedly tried to alert the Army after his son told him about the first killing, only to be rebuffed.
Two more slayings would follow. Military documents allege that five members of the unit staged a total of three murders in Kandahar province between January and May. Seven other soldiers have been charged with crimes related to the case, including hashish use, attempts to impede the investigation and a retaliatory gang assault on a private who blew the whistle.
Army officials have not disclosed a motive for the killings and macabre behavior. Nor have they explained how the attacks could have persisted without attracting scrutiny. They declined to comment on the case beyond the charges that have been filed, citing the ongoing investigation.
But a review of military court documents and interviews with people familiar with the investigation suggest the killings were committed essentially for sport by soldiers who had a fondness for hashish and alcohol.
The accused soldiers, through attorneys and family members, deny wrongdoing. But the case has already been marked by a cycle of accusations and counter-accusations among the defendants as they seek to pin the blame on each other, according to documents and interviews.
The Army has scheduled pre-trial hearings in the case this fall at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, home of the Stryker brigade. (The unit was renamed the 2nd Stryker Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, when it returned from Afghanistan in July.) Military officials say privately that they worry the hearings will draw further attention to the case, with photos and other evidence prompting anger among the Afghan civilians whose support is critical to the fight against the Taliban.
* The 'kill team' *
According to statements given to investigators, members of the unit - 3rd Platoon, Bravo Company, 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry Regiment - began talking about forming a "kill team" in December, shortly after the arrival of a new member, Staff Sgt. Calvin R. Gibbs, 25, of Billings, Mont.
Gibbs, whom some defendants have described as the ringleader, confided to his new mates that it had been easy for him to get away with "stuff" when he served in Iraq in 2004, according to the statements. It was his second tour in Afghanistan, having served there from January 2006 until May 2007.
The first opportunity presented itself Jan. 15 in the Maiwand district of Kandahar province. Members of the 3rd Platoon were providing perimeter security for a meeting between Army officers and tribal elders in the village of La Mohammed Kalay.
According to charging documents, an Afghan named Gul Mudin began walking toward the soldiers. As he approached, Cpl. Jeremy N. Morlock, 22, of Wasilla, Alaska, threw the grenade on the ground, records show, to create the illusion that the soldiers were under attack.
Pfc. Andrew H. Holmes, a 19-year-old from Boise, Idaho, saw the grenade and fired his weapon at Mudin, according to charging documents. The grenade exploded, prompting other soldiers to open fire on the villager as well, killing him.
In statements to investigators, the soldiers involved have given conflicting details. In one statement that his attorney has subsequently tried to suppress, Morlock said that Gibbs had given him the grenade and that others were also aware of the ruse beforehand. But Holmes and his attorney said he was in the dark and opened fire only because Morlock ordered him to do so.
"He was unwittingly used as the cover story," said Daniel Conway, a civilian defense attorney for Holmes. "He was in the wrong place at the wrong time."
Morlock, Holmes and Gibbs have each been charged with murder in the shooting. Attorneys for Morlock and Gibbs did not return phone calls seeking comment.
* A father's warning *
On Feb. 14, Christopher Winfield, a former Marine from Cape Coral, Fla., logged onto his Facebook account to chat with his son, Adam, a 3rd Platoon soldier who was up late in Afghanistan. Spec. Adam C. Winfield confided that he'd had a run-in with Gibbs, his squad leader. He also typed a mysterious note saying that some people get away with murder.
When his father pressed him to explain, Adam replied, "did you not understand what i just told you." He then referred to the slaying of the Afghan villager the month before, adding that other platoon members had threatened him because he did not approve. In addition, he said, they were bragging about how they wanted to find another victim.
"I was just shocked," Christopher Winfield said in a phone interview. "He was scared for his life at that point."
The father told his son that he would contact the Army to intervene and investigate. It was a Sunday, but he didn't wait. He called the Army inspector general's 24-hour hotline and left a voice mail. He called the office of Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), and left another message. He called a sergeant at Lewis-McChord who told him to call the Army's criminal investigations division. He left another message there.
Finally, he said, he called the Fort Lewis command center and spoke for 12 minutes to a sergeant on duty. He said the sergeant agreed that it sounded as if Adam was in potential danger but that, unless he was willing to report it to his superiors in Afghanistan, there was little the Army could do.
"He just kind of blew it off," Christopher Winfield said. "I was sitting there with my jaw on the ground."
Winfield said he doesn't recall the name of the sergeant he spoke with. Billing records that he kept confirm that he called Army officials; he also kept copies of transcripts of Facebook chats with this son. He said he specifically told the sergeant of his son's warning that more murders were in the works.
Army investigators have since taken a sworn statement from Christopher Winfield, as well as copies of his phone and Internet records.
* Other killings *
Eight days after Winfield tried to warn the Army, according to charging documents, members of the 3rd Platoon murdered someone else.
On Feb. 22, Marach Agha, an Afghan civilian, was killed by rifle fire near Forward Operating Base Ramrod in Kandahar province, where the 3rd Platoon was stationed. The Army has released few details about the slaying but has charged Gibbs, Morlock and Spec. Michael S. Wagnon II of Las Vegas with murder.
Wagnon has also been charged with possessing "a skull taken from an Afghan person's corpse." He allegedly took the head sometime during January or February 2010, but court documents do not specify whether it belonged to the Afghan he is charged with killing.
An attorney for Wagnon, who was on his second tour in Afghanistan and also served in Iraq, did not return a call seeking comment.
More mayhem followed in March, when Gibbs, Wagnon and three other soldiers - Staff Sgt. Robert G. Stevens, Sgt. Darren N. Jones and Pfc. Ashton A. Moore - opened fire on three Afghan men, according to charging documents. The documents do not provide basic details, such as the precise date of the shooting, the identities of the victims or whether they were wounded.
Members of the 3rd Platoon found their next victim on May 2, documents show. Gibbs, Morlock and Adam Winfield - the son of the former Marine who said he tried to alert the Army three months earlier - are accused of tossing a grenade and fatally shooting an Afghan cleric, Mullah Adahdad, near Forward Operating Base Ramrod.
Winfield's attorney, Eric S. Montalvo, said his client was ordered to shoot but fired high and missed. He and Winfield's parents say they can't understand why the Army has charged their son, given that his father tried to warn officials about the platoon.
Military police caught wind of the final killing a few days later, but only by happenstance. Records show they were coincidentally investigating reports of hashish use by members of the 3rd Platoon.
After word leaked that one soldier had spoken to military police, several platoon members retaliated, records show. They confronted the informant and beat him severely - punching, kicking and choking the soldier, then dragging him across the ground. As a last warning, the documents state, Gibbs menacingly waved finger bones he had collected from Afghan corpses.
However, the informant talked to the MPs again and told them what he had heard about the slayings, according to court documents.
Some members of his unit, he said in a statement, "when they are out at a village, wander off and kill someone and every time they say the same thing, about a guy throwing a grenade, but there is never proof."
This time, the Army acted quickly and made arrests.
20 September 2010
18 September 2010
Most Western Women In Death Spiral - Morals Gone . . .
"We must introduce into their education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their order."
Protocols of Zion, 16
"Leaving a long-term relationship and reentering the brave new world of dating was a culture shock....Many of these young women substitute an engagement ring with a noose."
by Stewart Overton
(Stewart is a 31-yr-old man living in Florida.)
* It all started on a cool January day in 1995. I went to the mall with a friend of mine to "Mac" or in other words to court any random young lady that I might find. Well, that day I lucked out and found a beautiful young girl that I would shortly begin to date. I was fifteen years old. Unbelievably, we braved the storm of youth together and it lasted eleven years. We never married or had children. Instead she went to college and I began a promising career. What was the cause of our eventual demise?
She obtained a bachelors degree in Biology and was an excellent pupil of the liberal establishment. She was highly competitive with me and was overtly against having a child. I demanded we seek counseling and she demanded that I go first; so I left, for good.
My woman was highly intelligent, fiercely argumentative, and had absolutely no sympathy for the anguish my young and idealistic mind was suffering, post 9-11 studying the manipulation and mechanics of an evil global elite. (She referred to my rants as psycho babble)
The break-up was devastating. Our friends cried for us. What a beautiful wedding it would have been. Afterward, I connected with the comrades of my youth. I assuaged my pain by embracing the social scene and all of it's debauchery and decadence. We caroused the bars and strip clubs, drinking, smoking, and looking for women in an apparent quest to debase ourselves.
RETURN TO THE "DATING" SCENE
I am politically conservative and a free thinker, because I obtained my high school diploma and didn't go to university. This spared me the scorched earth liberal indoctrination agenda. Secondly, I WAS in a long term relationship and didn't spend every waking moment chasing sex spiked with promiscuity. I was allowed to focus on higher things instead.
Leaving this long-term relationship and reentering the brave new world of dating was a culture shock.
I met a girl from a social website at the time too. She was 23 and asked me to join her for our first encounter on a Friday night around midnight at a gas station. She jumped in my car and we drove down the street to her home and It took all of five minutes for her to sit on my lap and begin kissing me. She asked me to come inside to have sex with her but I bit my knuckle and told her I would pick her up the next day so we could get to know each other a bit. I will leave the rest to your imagination. It is worth noting that she admitted to me she was a nymphomaniac and bi-sexual. Our courtship dance lasted about three days.
As a matter of fact, the six women I was with after the break up including the one I am with now, are self proclaimed bi-sexuals.
The next girl I encountered was frightening. She was 18 years old and I met her at a Gothic club. My pick up line was an insult. I managed to get her phone number and within the week, seduced her with sexual text messages and she drove to my neighborhood to see me. She had lots of tattoo's and piercings everywhere imaginable, including the six in her tongue. She was the most backward girl I have ever met.
She revealed to me plans for her suicide in the coming months. She was a sexual deviant; threesomes and S&M were commonplace in her life. I couldn't stay with her for many reasons but I learned something important.
Many of these young women substitute an engagement ring with a rope . Several of the girls I was with wanted me to choke them or tie them up and they would scratch and bite me till I bled during sex.
They needed to be physically assaulted in order to reach an orgasm and ensure they were far away from making love.
It's almost as if I was experiencing a perverted form of marriage. If they could seduce me to enter their world of sex and violence, I would become another casualty of having to engage in reckless behavior just to ejaculate and therefore, be trapped with a certain caliber of woman. I ran like Hell.
This particular example is an extreme situation, true, but I found it to be relative with most young women, even "normal" ones.
Bottom line, It was easy to get laid but the idea of commitment and family were laughable. The moral of the story is, morals have gone down the tube. The struggles that younger men and women face in America are collateral damage in a war zone as expansive as the western world itself.
I'm in a three year relationship now with a woman who was very liberal but has come around a lot to the idea that getting married, having a baby, and traditional male female roles might actually make us happy.
The problem is, I don't know if we can recover from the damage social engineering has inflicted upon us . The sex has all but disappeared. We both just look at smut instead, afraid of pregnancy. We're engaged but there is no wedding date in sight; It's falling apart because of our fear to move forward.
I feel like I have been brutalized by the media promotion of instant sex with all and sundry. I have pity for the generations to come, for I fear they will be twice as warped as me. We are being systematically and structurally re defined. I do not see any hope beside a barrage of solar flares setting us back a thousand years, or some of your articles becoming required reading. :)
Protocols of Zion, 16
"Leaving a long-term relationship and reentering the brave new world of dating was a culture shock....Many of these young women substitute an engagement ring with a noose."
by Stewart Overton
(Stewart is a 31-yr-old man living in Florida.)
* It all started on a cool January day in 1995. I went to the mall with a friend of mine to "Mac" or in other words to court any random young lady that I might find. Well, that day I lucked out and found a beautiful young girl that I would shortly begin to date. I was fifteen years old. Unbelievably, we braved the storm of youth together and it lasted eleven years. We never married or had children. Instead she went to college and I began a promising career. What was the cause of our eventual demise?
She obtained a bachelors degree in Biology and was an excellent pupil of the liberal establishment. She was highly competitive with me and was overtly against having a child. I demanded we seek counseling and she demanded that I go first; so I left, for good.
My woman was highly intelligent, fiercely argumentative, and had absolutely no sympathy for the anguish my young and idealistic mind was suffering, post 9-11 studying the manipulation and mechanics of an evil global elite. (She referred to my rants as psycho babble)
The break-up was devastating. Our friends cried for us. What a beautiful wedding it would have been. Afterward, I connected with the comrades of my youth. I assuaged my pain by embracing the social scene and all of it's debauchery and decadence. We caroused the bars and strip clubs, drinking, smoking, and looking for women in an apparent quest to debase ourselves.
RETURN TO THE "DATING" SCENE
I am politically conservative and a free thinker, because I obtained my high school diploma and didn't go to university. This spared me the scorched earth liberal indoctrination agenda. Secondly, I WAS in a long term relationship and didn't spend every waking moment chasing sex spiked with promiscuity. I was allowed to focus on higher things instead.
Leaving this long-term relationship and reentering the brave new world of dating was a culture shock.
I met a girl from a social website at the time too. She was 23 and asked me to join her for our first encounter on a Friday night around midnight at a gas station. She jumped in my car and we drove down the street to her home and It took all of five minutes for her to sit on my lap and begin kissing me. She asked me to come inside to have sex with her but I bit my knuckle and told her I would pick her up the next day so we could get to know each other a bit. I will leave the rest to your imagination. It is worth noting that she admitted to me she was a nymphomaniac and bi-sexual. Our courtship dance lasted about three days.
As a matter of fact, the six women I was with after the break up including the one I am with now, are self proclaimed bi-sexuals.
The next girl I encountered was frightening. She was 18 years old and I met her at a Gothic club. My pick up line was an insult. I managed to get her phone number and within the week, seduced her with sexual text messages and she drove to my neighborhood to see me. She had lots of tattoo's and piercings everywhere imaginable, including the six in her tongue. She was the most backward girl I have ever met.
She revealed to me plans for her suicide in the coming months. She was a sexual deviant; threesomes and S&M were commonplace in her life. I couldn't stay with her for many reasons but I learned something important.
Many of these young women substitute an engagement ring with a rope . Several of the girls I was with wanted me to choke them or tie them up and they would scratch and bite me till I bled during sex.
They needed to be physically assaulted in order to reach an orgasm and ensure they were far away from making love.
It's almost as if I was experiencing a perverted form of marriage. If they could seduce me to enter their world of sex and violence, I would become another casualty of having to engage in reckless behavior just to ejaculate and therefore, be trapped with a certain caliber of woman. I ran like Hell.
This particular example is an extreme situation, true, but I found it to be relative with most young women, even "normal" ones.
Bottom line, It was easy to get laid but the idea of commitment and family were laughable. The moral of the story is, morals have gone down the tube. The struggles that younger men and women face in America are collateral damage in a war zone as expansive as the western world itself.
I'm in a three year relationship now with a woman who was very liberal but has come around a lot to the idea that getting married, having a baby, and traditional male female roles might actually make us happy.
The problem is, I don't know if we can recover from the damage social engineering has inflicted upon us . The sex has all but disappeared. We both just look at smut instead, afraid of pregnancy. We're engaged but there is no wedding date in sight; It's falling apart because of our fear to move forward.
I feel like I have been brutalized by the media promotion of instant sex with all and sundry. I have pity for the generations to come, for I fear they will be twice as warped as me. We are being systematically and structurally re defined. I do not see any hope beside a barrage of solar flares setting us back a thousand years, or some of your articles becoming required reading. :)
17 September 2010
AIDS a man-made disease - contniued
* The Manmade Origin Of AIDS *
Paris and Dr. Kwame Nantambu, September 27, 2002
* Yes, you read it correctly. AIDS is manmade. Here you will read, explicitly,
that the US government funded the creation of this virus that would ?lead to
yet another method of massive killing of large populations? and ?be
refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we
depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.? Yes, there
is most definitely a war going on, and it is much scarier than you probably
ever imagined. Read on:
The Development of the AIDS virus was funded in 1969 through funds obtained
by the United States Defense Department via House Bill 15090. The Bill,
which called for the US Defense Department to receive $10 million dollars to
research, test and develop the virus, was reviewed in Hearings before the
Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives
during the ninety-first Congress in review of the Defense Appropriations for
1970. Copies of the full text of the Bill are not available in any public
library and are impossible to locate online, although many other Bills are.
Part Five of H.R. 15090 was entitled RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND
EVALUATION, sponsored by the Department of the Army, the Advanced Research
Project Agency (now DARPA), and Defense Research and Engineering.
The Feasibility program and laboratories were to have been completed by 1974
- 1975 and the virus between 1974 - 1979. The World Health Organization
(WHO) started to inject AIDS - laced smallpox vaccine (Vaccina) into
Africans in 1977. Over 2000 young white male homosexuals were injected with
laced Hepatitis B vaccine in 1978 through the Centers for Disease Control
and the New York Blood Center. The development of the virus apparently had a
dual purpose: (1) As a political/ethnic weapon to be used against black
individuals and (2) one of the programmed efforts at de-population.
For the record it must be stated emphatically that the origin of AIDS has
absolutely nothing to do with the green monkey, African people nor the
Haitians.
The stark reality is that, according to The Strecker Memorandum (1983):
-AIDS is a man-made disease
-AIDS is not a homosexual disease
-AIDS is not a venereal disease
-AIDS can be carried by mosquitoes
-There are at least six different AIDS viruses in the world 1
AIDS represents the most potent medical weapon in the armory of Europeans to
annihilate, decimate and castrate African, Hispanic and Asian peoples under
the rubric of European supremacy.
Why and How was AIDS Created?
The AIDS virus was created 'as a political/ethnic weapon to be used mainly
against Blacks.2 ?AIDS is biological warfare at its Euro-supremacist
zenith,? according to Malcolm Turner in his book AIDS is Biological Warfare:
A Warning to African People. ?AIDS is not an act of God against homosexuals;
it did not appear out of thin air and it did not come from Africa. It was
designed to kill people of color and a review of the statistics show that
this is exactly what is happening...it is the creation of a sick, demented
white racist power structure...?3
?The creation and subsequent deployment of the AIDS virus by the World
Health Organization was not just a diabolical scientific exercise that got
out of hand. It was a cold-blood successful attempt to create a killer virus
which was then used in a successful experiment in Africa?.4
The creation of AIDS ?was not an accident?. It was deliberate.5 AIDS is
nothing less than genocide by white racists against the rest of humanity.6
The Real Origin of AIDS
The AIDS virus was created by the United States government at Fort Dietrich
in Maryland, a biological warfare laboratory in building number A550 in the
P4 lab. The sum of US $10m was requested by the Defense Department to build
the lab under the House of Representatives Bill number H.R. 15090 in the
91st Congress in 1970.7
Dr. Theodore Strecker writes, ?The US National Cancer institute, in
collaboration with the World Health Organization, manufactured the AIDS
virus in their laboratories at Fort Detrich, Maryland. They combined two
deadly retroviruses, the Bovine Leukemia Virus and the Visna Virus, and
injected them into human tissue cultures. The result was the AIDS virus, the
first human retrovirus known to man and now believed to be 100 percent fatal
to those infected?.8
Dr. Strecker further contends that AIDS couldn't have engineered itself, and
reiterates that it was produced in a laboratory by virologists. ?The World
Health Organization (WHO) called for scientists to work with these deadly
agents and attempt to make a hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans. An
attempt was made to see if viruses could in fact exert selective effects on
immune function. The possibility was looked into that the immune response to
the virus itself would be impaired if the infecting virus damaged, more or
less selectively, the cell responding to the virus?.9
The AIDS epidemic was triggered by the mass vaccination campaign which
eradicated smallpox.10 In fact, the WHO itself has studied ?new scientific
evidence suggesting that immunization with the smallpox vaccine Vaccinia,
awakened the unsuspected, dormant human immuno defense virus infection
(HIV)?.11
Pearce Wright, an advisor to the WHO, writes, ?I thought it was just a
coincidence until we studied the latest findings about the reactions which
can be caused by Vaccinia. Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the
explanation to the explosion of AIDS?.12
The fact of the matter is that the WHO concluded that ?in the relation to
the immune response, a number of useful experimental approaches can be
visualized?.13 As a result, ?they suggested that a way to do this would be
to put their new killer virus (AIDS) into a vaccination program, sit back
and observe the results?.14
The WHO used smallpox vaccine as their vicious vehicle to spread the AIDS
virus and the geographic areas chosen were Uganda and other African
countries, Haiti, Brazil and Japan. The present ?AIDS epidemic coincides
with these geographical areas?.15
As an addendum, ?there is also substantial evidence? to show that a
confidential source in the WHO has revealed that there is ?a strong
correlation between the proportion of people in different central African
countries who consented to the smallpox vaccine program and the proportion
of those now infected with AIDS?.16
The stark reality is that ?the AIDS virus must be a man-made, bio-engineered
virus?.17
Hence, it?s no great surprise that the WHO, in true Euro-supremacist modus
operandi, ?started to inject AIDS-laced smallpox vaccine (Vaccina) into over
100 million Africans (as part of its global non-European population
reduction program) in 1977?.18
Dr. Theodore A. Strecker further writes, "If the African green monkey could
transmit AIDS to humans, the present known amount of infection in Africa
makes it statistically impossible for a single episode, such as a monkey
biting someone, to have brought this epidemic to this point. The doubling
time of the number of people infected, about every 14 months, when
correlated with the first known case, and the present known number of cases,
prove beyond a doubt that a large number of people had to have been infected
at the same time. Starting in 1972 with the first case from our mythical
monkey and doubling the number infected from that single source every 14
months you get only a few thousand cases. From 1972 to 1987 is 15 years or
180 months. If it takes 14 months to double the number of cases, then there
would have been 13 doublings, 1 then 2, then 4, then 8, etc. In 15 years,
from a single source of infection there would be about 8,000 cases in
Africa, not 75 million AIDS infected people. We are approaching World War II
mortality statistics here without a shot being fired?.19
The fact of the matter is that under the current European global policy of
annihilating people of color, ?AIDS is expected to kill more people and
orphan more children than all the wars of the 20th century combined?.20
The Global Impact of AIDS
The spread of the AIDS virus is omnipresent among African peoples and people
of color. AIDS is without any doubt, the largest epidemic in human history.
The global magnitude of the impact of AIDS is such that as of June 2001,
?more than 70 percent of the people with the virus that causes AIDS are in
sub-Saharan Africa, the poorest region in the world?.21 AIDS has transformed
Africa into a ?killing field?.22
In fifteen years, ?AIDS has killed 11 million Africans, more than 80 percent
of the world's AIDS deaths?.23 AIDS ?has struck some 36 million people, 25.3
million of them in Africa, and orphaned 13 million children?.24
According to the United Nations in 1998, there are 5,500 AIDS-related
funerals every day in Africa.25 In Zimbabwe alone, 1,200 die each week from
AIDS. As of February 2001, there are 5.8 million AIDS cases in
South/Southeast Asia, 1.4 million in Latin America, and 640,000 in East
Asia. In fact, in June 1991, it was reported that ?by the end of this
decade, Asia will be the epicenter of the worldwide AIDS epidemic, host to
the fastest-growing AIDS population in the world?.26
As of February 2000, the Caribbean has as high as 700,000 people infected
with AIDS, thus making the region ?the second largest incidence in the world
after Africa?.27 In the case of the United States, African-Americans account
for about 11 percent of the national population but 57 percent of the AIDS
cases. In 1999, African-Americans and Hispanics accounted for almost 70
percent of new HIV infections.
However, strangely enough, death rates in Europe of people infected with the
virus that causes AIDS have fallen 84 percent since 1985.28
The reality is that two-thirds of the people in the world infected with AIDS
today are in sub-Saharan Africa, but only about 2 percent are in Western
Europe. That is no accident. It is genocide. The sole purpose of this
heinous man-made virus is to reduce the global population of African peoples
and people of color through AIDS decimation, annihilation and castration, by
any and all means necessary. AIDS represents a medical intifadah declared
against African people and people of color.
The Tuskegee Experiment
A relevant comparison analysis is the Tuskegee Experiment that was conducted
by the U.S. government on innocent and unsuspecting African-American males
from 1932-1972.
In 1932, the United States Public Health Services solicited and recruited
about 400 African-American males as guinea pigs in ?one of the most
notorious medical experiments ever? on the study of the effects of syphilis
in Macon County, Alabama.29
These subjects never gave informed consent for their participation in the
study. ?The Black men were never told they had syphilis nor were they told
their disease could endanger their families?.30 In the fall of 1932,
handbills were posted and circulated at several church gatherings in the
poor county, where even the one black doctor served only those who could
afford to pay. The ads promised "special treatment" for men with "bad
blood," which, to local folks, could mean anything from VD to anemia to
indigestion. Eager to take advantage of any kind of medical care that was
free, men signed up in droves. Sadly, even when a penicillin treatment cure
for syphilis became available in the 1940s, the men in the Tuskegee syphilis
experiment ?were not allowed to receive the antibiotic?.31
By U.S. government decree ?other doctors in Macon County were forbidden to
treat any of the men in the study?.32 These Black men were sharecroppers
with no formal education. ?Many had never seen a doctor, much less been
treated by one. Anything white people asked them to do, they did?.33
The U.S. has stated that ?the purpose of the study was to record the
destructive effects of untreated syphilis and to follow closely the medical
progress of the group until each man died?.34 However, according to Martin
P. Levine, the experiment was easily justified by physicians and scientists
because ?it was widely believed that Black racial inferiority made them a
notoriously syphilis-soaked race?.35
These physicians and scientists were convinced that: ?(The) smaller brains
(of these Black men) lacked mechanisms for controlling sexual desire,
causing them to be highly promiscuous. They matured early and consequently
were more sexually active, and the Black man's enormous penis with its long
foreskin was prone to venereal infections. These physiological differences
meant that disease must affect the races differently?.36
Conclusion
In sum, the U.S. government-sponsored Tuskegee Experiment is germ-biological
warfare committed on its own citizens for 40 years. It must be noted,
however, that in 1974, a US Civil Rights attorney won a $10m settlement from
the government for the Tuskegee victims and their heirs, and another $2.1m
payment was received in 1976. On May 16, 1997, then-President Bill Clinton
issued an official public apology on behalf of the U.S. government to the
victims of the Tuskegee experiment.37
So you see, the notion of waging biological warfare on so-called undesirable
populations is not a foreign one to the US Government. This is it?s legacy -
the greatest homicidal and genocidal killing machine in the history of
civilization.
HIV and AIDS: Are You at Risk?
What is HIV and how can I get it?
HIV - the human immunodeficiency virus - is a virus that kills your body?s
"CD4 cells." CD4 cells (also called T-helper cells) help your body fight off
infection and disease. HIV can be passed from person to person if someone
with HIV infection has sex with or shares drug injection needles with
another person. It also can be passed from a mother to her baby when she is
pregnant, when she delivers the baby, or if she breast-feeds her baby.
What is AIDS?
AIDS - the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome - is a disease you get when
HIV destroys your body?s immune system. Normally, your immune system helps
you fight off illness. When your immune system fails you can become very
sick and can die.
What do I need to know about HIV?
The first cases of AIDS were identified in the United States in 1981, but
AIDS most likely existed here and in other parts of the world for many years
before that time. In 1984 scientists proved that HIV causes AIDS.
Anyone can get HIV. The most important thing to know is how you can get the
virus.
can get HIV:
- By having unprotected sex- sex without a condom- with someone who has HIV.
The virus can be in an infected person?s blood, semen, or vaginal secretions
and can enter your body through tiny cuts or sores in your skin, or in the
lining of your vagina, penis, rectum, or mouth.
- By sharing a needle and syringe to inject drugs or sharing drug equipment
used to prepare drugs for injection with someone who has HIV.
From a blood transfusion or blood clotting factor that you got before
1985. (But today it is unlikely you could get infected that way because all
blood in the United States has been tested for HIV since 1985.)
- Babies born to women with HIV also can become infected during pregnancy,
birth, or breast-feeding.
You cannot get HIV:
- By working with or being around someone who has HIV.
- From sweat, clothes, drinking fountains, phones, toilet seats, or through
everyday things like sharing a meal.
- From donating blood.
- From a closed-mouth kiss (but there is a chance of getting it from
open-mouthed or "French" kissing with an infected person because of possible
blood contact).
How can I protect myself?
- Don?t share needles and syringes used to inject drugs, steroids, vitamins,
or for tattooing or body piercing. Also, don?t share equipment ("works")
used to prepare drugs to be injected. Many people have been infected with
HIV, hepatitis, and other germs this way. Germs from an infected person can
stay in a needle and then be injected directly into the next person who uses
the needle.
- Don?t have sex. Or, if you do make this decision, have sex only with one
partner who you know doesn?t have HIV and is only having sex with you. The
more sex partners you have, the greater your chances are of getting HIV or
other diseases passed through sex.
- Use a latex condom every time you have sex, including oral and anal sex.
If you are allergic to latex, there is a polyurethane (a type of plastic)
condom that you can try. There also is a condom that women can use to
protect themselves. Don?t use lambskin condoms - they might not protect you
against HIV.
- Don?t share razors or toothbrushes because of the possibility of contact
with blood. If you are pregnant or think you might be soon, talk to a doctor
or your local health department about being tested for HIV. Drug treatments
are available to help you and reduce the chance of passing HIV to your baby
if you have it.
How do I know if I have HIV or AIDS?
You might have HIV and still feel perfectly healthy. The only way to know
for sure if you are infected or not is to be tested. Talk with a
knowledgeable health care provider or counselor both before and after you
are tested. You can go to your doctor or health department for testing or
buy a home collection kit (for testing for HIV antibodies) at many
pharmacies. To find out where to go in your area for HIV counseling and
testing, call your local health department or the CDC National AIDS Hotline,
at 1-800-342-AIDS (2437).
Your doctor or health care provider can give you a confidential HIV test.
The information on your HIV test and test results are confidential, just as
your other medical information. This means it can be shared only with people
authorized to see your medical records. You can ask your doctor, health care
provider, or HIV counselor at the place you are tested to explain who can
obtain this information. For example, you may want to ask whether your
insurance company could find out your HIV status if you make a claim for
health insurance benefits or apply for life insurance or disability
insurance.
In many states, you can be tested anonymously. These tests are usually given
at special places known as anonymous testing sites. When you get an
anonymous HIV test, the testing site records only a number or code with the
test result, not your name. A counselor gives you this number at the time
your blood, saliva, or urine is taken for the test, then you return to the
testing site (or perhaps call the testing site, for example with home
collection kits) and give them your number or code to learn the results of
your test.
You are more likely to test positive for (be infected with) HIV if you:
Have ever shared injection drug needles and syringes or "works." Have ever
had sex without a condom with someone who had HIV. Have ever had a sexually
transmitted disease, like chlamydia or gonorrhea. Received a blood
transfusion or a blood clotting factor between 1978 and 1985. Have ever had
sex with someone who has done any of those things
What can I do if the test shows I have HIV?
Although HIV is a very serious infection, many people with HIV and AIDS are
living longer, healthier lives today, thanks to new and effective
treatments. It is very important to make sure you have a doctor who knows
how to treat HIV. If you don?t know which doctor to use, talk with a health
care professional or trained HIV counselor. If you are pregnant or are
planning to become pregnant, this is especially important.
There also are other things you can do for yourself to stay healthy. Here
are a few:
Follow your doctor?s instructions. Keep your appointments. Your doctor may
prescribe medicine for you. Take the medicine just the way he or she tells
you to because taking only some of your medicine gives your HIV infection
more chance to grow. Get immunizations (shots) to prevent infections such as
pneumonia and flu. Your doctor will tell you when to get these shots. If you
smoke or if you use drugs not prescribed by your doctor, quit. Eat healthy
foods. This will help keep you strong, keep your energy and weight up, and
help your body protect itself. Exercise regularly to stay strong and fit.
Get enough sleep and rest.
How can I find out more about HIV and AIDS?
You can call the CDC National AIDS Hotline at 1-800-342-2437 (Spanish/
Español: 1-800-344-7432; TTY access: 1-800-243-7889). The Hotline is staffed
with people trained to answer your questions about HIV and AIDS in a prompt
and confidential manner. Staff at the Hotline can offer you a wide variety
of written materials and put you in touch with organizations in your area
that deal with HIV and AIDS.
On the Internet, you can get information on HIV and AIDS from the CDC
Division of HIV/ AIDS Prevention. Other sources of information are the CDC
National Prevention Information Network, or the HIV/ AIDS Treatment
Information Service.
For more information about HIV or AIDS, call:
CDC National Prevention Information Network
(800) 458-5231
1-301-562-1098 (International)
P.O. Box 6003
Rockville, MD 20849-6003
References
1. Is AIDS manmade?: The Strecker Memorandum. Distributed by The Strecker
Group, Eagle Rock, CA., 1983. 2. Jack Felder. (1989). AIDS: United States
Germs Warfare at its Best with Documents and Proof, 6. 3. Malcolm Turner.
(June 24, 1991). AIDS is Biological Warfare: A Warning to African People,
African Connection, 9. 4. Turner. (1991) and William Campbell Douglass,
(October 17, 1990) Who Murdered Africa, The Challenger, 25. 5. Douglass.
(1990), 25. 6. Turner. (1991), 25. 7. Is AIDS manmade?: The Strecker
Memorandum (1983). 8. William Campbell Douglass, (undated), Who Murdered
Africa: Organization unleashed killer disease on unsuspecting mankind in
biological boondoggle of the century. 9. (Undated). Is AIDS man-made?
Strecker Memorandum claims AIDS was created and deployed by scientists with
an on-going cover-up. Opinion expressed by Dr. Theodore A. Strecker on TV
program ?For the People.? 10. Pearce Wright. (May 1989). Smallpox vaccine
triggered AIDS virus,' Times, 25. 11. Wright. (1989). 12. Wright. (1989).
13. Douglass. (October 17, 1990). 14. Douglass. (1990). 15. Douglass.
(1990). 16. Turner. (1991). 17. AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry
Into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic. (1988). Aries Rising Press. 18.
Felder. (1989). 19. Douglass. (1990). 20. Federal Information Systems
Corporation, Federal News Service. (September 21, 1999). Speech by Pres.
Clinton to the 54th United Nations General Assembly, New York City. 21. 23
Ravi Nessman. (June 6, 2001). AIDS expert for U.N. warns epidemic is likely
to worsen. The Plain Dealer. 22. Angus Shaw. (September 16, 1999). U.N.
agency says AIDS scourge is making Africa a killer field'. The Plain Dealer,
7A. 23. Shaw. (1999). 24. Maggie Farley. (June 26, 2001). U.N. chief to
world: Face facts on AIDS. The Plain Dealer. 25. Donald G. McNeil. (December
16, 1998). AIDS epidemic alters Africa's culture of mourning. The Plain
Dealer. 26. Jim McDermott. (June 23, 1991). Asia-Epicenter of the AIDS
Epidemic. The Washington Post. 27. Jeannie Relly. (February 26, 2000). HIV
infections up in Caribbean. The Plain Dealer. 28. Emma Ross. (November 27,
1998). AIDS toll falling in Europe, study says. The Plain Dealer. 29.
Felder. (1989). 30. Felder. (1989). 31. Felder. (1989). 32. Felder. (1989).
33. Barbara Day. (June 20, 1991). Deadly Tuskegee syphilis study 40 years
later. The Capital Spotlight, 6. 34. Felder. (1989). 35. Felder. (1989). 36.
Felder. (1989). 37. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. (May 16,
1997). Remarks by the President in Apology for Study Done in Tuskegee, 2.
Excerpts of this essay are courtesy of Dr. Kwame Nantambu, an Associate
Professor, Dept. of Pan-African Studies, Kent State University, U.S.A.
Paris and Dr. Kwame Nantambu, September 27, 2002
* Yes, you read it correctly. AIDS is manmade. Here you will read, explicitly,
that the US government funded the creation of this virus that would ?lead to
yet another method of massive killing of large populations? and ?be
refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we
depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.? Yes, there
is most definitely a war going on, and it is much scarier than you probably
ever imagined. Read on:
The Development of the AIDS virus was funded in 1969 through funds obtained
by the United States Defense Department via House Bill 15090. The Bill,
which called for the US Defense Department to receive $10 million dollars to
research, test and develop the virus, was reviewed in Hearings before the
Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives
during the ninety-first Congress in review of the Defense Appropriations for
1970. Copies of the full text of the Bill are not available in any public
library and are impossible to locate online, although many other Bills are.
Part Five of H.R. 15090 was entitled RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND
EVALUATION, sponsored by the Department of the Army, the Advanced Research
Project Agency (now DARPA), and Defense Research and Engineering.
The Feasibility program and laboratories were to have been completed by 1974
- 1975 and the virus between 1974 - 1979. The World Health Organization
(WHO) started to inject AIDS - laced smallpox vaccine (Vaccina) into
Africans in 1977. Over 2000 young white male homosexuals were injected with
laced Hepatitis B vaccine in 1978 through the Centers for Disease Control
and the New York Blood Center. The development of the virus apparently had a
dual purpose: (1) As a political/ethnic weapon to be used against black
individuals and (2) one of the programmed efforts at de-population.
For the record it must be stated emphatically that the origin of AIDS has
absolutely nothing to do with the green monkey, African people nor the
Haitians.
The stark reality is that, according to The Strecker Memorandum (1983):
-AIDS is a man-made disease
-AIDS is not a homosexual disease
-AIDS is not a venereal disease
-AIDS can be carried by mosquitoes
-There are at least six different AIDS viruses in the world 1
AIDS represents the most potent medical weapon in the armory of Europeans to
annihilate, decimate and castrate African, Hispanic and Asian peoples under
the rubric of European supremacy.
Why and How was AIDS Created?
The AIDS virus was created 'as a political/ethnic weapon to be used mainly
against Blacks.2 ?AIDS is biological warfare at its Euro-supremacist
zenith,? according to Malcolm Turner in his book AIDS is Biological Warfare:
A Warning to African People. ?AIDS is not an act of God against homosexuals;
it did not appear out of thin air and it did not come from Africa. It was
designed to kill people of color and a review of the statistics show that
this is exactly what is happening...it is the creation of a sick, demented
white racist power structure...?3
?The creation and subsequent deployment of the AIDS virus by the World
Health Organization was not just a diabolical scientific exercise that got
out of hand. It was a cold-blood successful attempt to create a killer virus
which was then used in a successful experiment in Africa?.4
The creation of AIDS ?was not an accident?. It was deliberate.5 AIDS is
nothing less than genocide by white racists against the rest of humanity.6
The Real Origin of AIDS
The AIDS virus was created by the United States government at Fort Dietrich
in Maryland, a biological warfare laboratory in building number A550 in the
P4 lab. The sum of US $10m was requested by the Defense Department to build
the lab under the House of Representatives Bill number H.R. 15090 in the
91st Congress in 1970.7
Dr. Theodore Strecker writes, ?The US National Cancer institute, in
collaboration with the World Health Organization, manufactured the AIDS
virus in their laboratories at Fort Detrich, Maryland. They combined two
deadly retroviruses, the Bovine Leukemia Virus and the Visna Virus, and
injected them into human tissue cultures. The result was the AIDS virus, the
first human retrovirus known to man and now believed to be 100 percent fatal
to those infected?.8
Dr. Strecker further contends that AIDS couldn't have engineered itself, and
reiterates that it was produced in a laboratory by virologists. ?The World
Health Organization (WHO) called for scientists to work with these deadly
agents and attempt to make a hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans. An
attempt was made to see if viruses could in fact exert selective effects on
immune function. The possibility was looked into that the immune response to
the virus itself would be impaired if the infecting virus damaged, more or
less selectively, the cell responding to the virus?.9
The AIDS epidemic was triggered by the mass vaccination campaign which
eradicated smallpox.10 In fact, the WHO itself has studied ?new scientific
evidence suggesting that immunization with the smallpox vaccine Vaccinia,
awakened the unsuspected, dormant human immuno defense virus infection
(HIV)?.11
Pearce Wright, an advisor to the WHO, writes, ?I thought it was just a
coincidence until we studied the latest findings about the reactions which
can be caused by Vaccinia. Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the
explanation to the explosion of AIDS?.12
The fact of the matter is that the WHO concluded that ?in the relation to
the immune response, a number of useful experimental approaches can be
visualized?.13 As a result, ?they suggested that a way to do this would be
to put their new killer virus (AIDS) into a vaccination program, sit back
and observe the results?.14
The WHO used smallpox vaccine as their vicious vehicle to spread the AIDS
virus and the geographic areas chosen were Uganda and other African
countries, Haiti, Brazil and Japan. The present ?AIDS epidemic coincides
with these geographical areas?.15
As an addendum, ?there is also substantial evidence? to show that a
confidential source in the WHO has revealed that there is ?a strong
correlation between the proportion of people in different central African
countries who consented to the smallpox vaccine program and the proportion
of those now infected with AIDS?.16
The stark reality is that ?the AIDS virus must be a man-made, bio-engineered
virus?.17
Hence, it?s no great surprise that the WHO, in true Euro-supremacist modus
operandi, ?started to inject AIDS-laced smallpox vaccine (Vaccina) into over
100 million Africans (as part of its global non-European population
reduction program) in 1977?.18
Dr. Theodore A. Strecker further writes, "If the African green monkey could
transmit AIDS to humans, the present known amount of infection in Africa
makes it statistically impossible for a single episode, such as a monkey
biting someone, to have brought this epidemic to this point. The doubling
time of the number of people infected, about every 14 months, when
correlated with the first known case, and the present known number of cases,
prove beyond a doubt that a large number of people had to have been infected
at the same time. Starting in 1972 with the first case from our mythical
monkey and doubling the number infected from that single source every 14
months you get only a few thousand cases. From 1972 to 1987 is 15 years or
180 months. If it takes 14 months to double the number of cases, then there
would have been 13 doublings, 1 then 2, then 4, then 8, etc. In 15 years,
from a single source of infection there would be about 8,000 cases in
Africa, not 75 million AIDS infected people. We are approaching World War II
mortality statistics here without a shot being fired?.19
The fact of the matter is that under the current European global policy of
annihilating people of color, ?AIDS is expected to kill more people and
orphan more children than all the wars of the 20th century combined?.20
The Global Impact of AIDS
The spread of the AIDS virus is omnipresent among African peoples and people
of color. AIDS is without any doubt, the largest epidemic in human history.
The global magnitude of the impact of AIDS is such that as of June 2001,
?more than 70 percent of the people with the virus that causes AIDS are in
sub-Saharan Africa, the poorest region in the world?.21 AIDS has transformed
Africa into a ?killing field?.22
In fifteen years, ?AIDS has killed 11 million Africans, more than 80 percent
of the world's AIDS deaths?.23 AIDS ?has struck some 36 million people, 25.3
million of them in Africa, and orphaned 13 million children?.24
According to the United Nations in 1998, there are 5,500 AIDS-related
funerals every day in Africa.25 In Zimbabwe alone, 1,200 die each week from
AIDS. As of February 2001, there are 5.8 million AIDS cases in
South/Southeast Asia, 1.4 million in Latin America, and 640,000 in East
Asia. In fact, in June 1991, it was reported that ?by the end of this
decade, Asia will be the epicenter of the worldwide AIDS epidemic, host to
the fastest-growing AIDS population in the world?.26
As of February 2000, the Caribbean has as high as 700,000 people infected
with AIDS, thus making the region ?the second largest incidence in the world
after Africa?.27 In the case of the United States, African-Americans account
for about 11 percent of the national population but 57 percent of the AIDS
cases. In 1999, African-Americans and Hispanics accounted for almost 70
percent of new HIV infections.
However, strangely enough, death rates in Europe of people infected with the
virus that causes AIDS have fallen 84 percent since 1985.28
The reality is that two-thirds of the people in the world infected with AIDS
today are in sub-Saharan Africa, but only about 2 percent are in Western
Europe. That is no accident. It is genocide. The sole purpose of this
heinous man-made virus is to reduce the global population of African peoples
and people of color through AIDS decimation, annihilation and castration, by
any and all means necessary. AIDS represents a medical intifadah declared
against African people and people of color.
The Tuskegee Experiment
A relevant comparison analysis is the Tuskegee Experiment that was conducted
by the U.S. government on innocent and unsuspecting African-American males
from 1932-1972.
In 1932, the United States Public Health Services solicited and recruited
about 400 African-American males as guinea pigs in ?one of the most
notorious medical experiments ever? on the study of the effects of syphilis
in Macon County, Alabama.29
These subjects never gave informed consent for their participation in the
study. ?The Black men were never told they had syphilis nor were they told
their disease could endanger their families?.30 In the fall of 1932,
handbills were posted and circulated at several church gatherings in the
poor county, where even the one black doctor served only those who could
afford to pay. The ads promised "special treatment" for men with "bad
blood," which, to local folks, could mean anything from VD to anemia to
indigestion. Eager to take advantage of any kind of medical care that was
free, men signed up in droves. Sadly, even when a penicillin treatment cure
for syphilis became available in the 1940s, the men in the Tuskegee syphilis
experiment ?were not allowed to receive the antibiotic?.31
By U.S. government decree ?other doctors in Macon County were forbidden to
treat any of the men in the study?.32 These Black men were sharecroppers
with no formal education. ?Many had never seen a doctor, much less been
treated by one. Anything white people asked them to do, they did?.33
The U.S. has stated that ?the purpose of the study was to record the
destructive effects of untreated syphilis and to follow closely the medical
progress of the group until each man died?.34 However, according to Martin
P. Levine, the experiment was easily justified by physicians and scientists
because ?it was widely believed that Black racial inferiority made them a
notoriously syphilis-soaked race?.35
These physicians and scientists were convinced that: ?(The) smaller brains
(of these Black men) lacked mechanisms for controlling sexual desire,
causing them to be highly promiscuous. They matured early and consequently
were more sexually active, and the Black man's enormous penis with its long
foreskin was prone to venereal infections. These physiological differences
meant that disease must affect the races differently?.36
Conclusion
In sum, the U.S. government-sponsored Tuskegee Experiment is germ-biological
warfare committed on its own citizens for 40 years. It must be noted,
however, that in 1974, a US Civil Rights attorney won a $10m settlement from
the government for the Tuskegee victims and their heirs, and another $2.1m
payment was received in 1976. On May 16, 1997, then-President Bill Clinton
issued an official public apology on behalf of the U.S. government to the
victims of the Tuskegee experiment.37
So you see, the notion of waging biological warfare on so-called undesirable
populations is not a foreign one to the US Government. This is it?s legacy -
the greatest homicidal and genocidal killing machine in the history of
civilization.
HIV and AIDS: Are You at Risk?
What is HIV and how can I get it?
HIV - the human immunodeficiency virus - is a virus that kills your body?s
"CD4 cells." CD4 cells (also called T-helper cells) help your body fight off
infection and disease. HIV can be passed from person to person if someone
with HIV infection has sex with or shares drug injection needles with
another person. It also can be passed from a mother to her baby when she is
pregnant, when she delivers the baby, or if she breast-feeds her baby.
What is AIDS?
AIDS - the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome - is a disease you get when
HIV destroys your body?s immune system. Normally, your immune system helps
you fight off illness. When your immune system fails you can become very
sick and can die.
What do I need to know about HIV?
The first cases of AIDS were identified in the United States in 1981, but
AIDS most likely existed here and in other parts of the world for many years
before that time. In 1984 scientists proved that HIV causes AIDS.
Anyone can get HIV. The most important thing to know is how you can get the
virus.
can get HIV:
- By having unprotected sex- sex without a condom- with someone who has HIV.
The virus can be in an infected person?s blood, semen, or vaginal secretions
and can enter your body through tiny cuts or sores in your skin, or in the
lining of your vagina, penis, rectum, or mouth.
- By sharing a needle and syringe to inject drugs or sharing drug equipment
used to prepare drugs for injection with someone who has HIV.
From a blood transfusion or blood clotting factor that you got before
1985. (But today it is unlikely you could get infected that way because all
blood in the United States has been tested for HIV since 1985.)
- Babies born to women with HIV also can become infected during pregnancy,
birth, or breast-feeding.
You cannot get HIV:
- By working with or being around someone who has HIV.
- From sweat, clothes, drinking fountains, phones, toilet seats, or through
everyday things like sharing a meal.
- From donating blood.
- From a closed-mouth kiss (but there is a chance of getting it from
open-mouthed or "French" kissing with an infected person because of possible
blood contact).
How can I protect myself?
- Don?t share needles and syringes used to inject drugs, steroids, vitamins,
or for tattooing or body piercing. Also, don?t share equipment ("works")
used to prepare drugs to be injected. Many people have been infected with
HIV, hepatitis, and other germs this way. Germs from an infected person can
stay in a needle and then be injected directly into the next person who uses
the needle.
- Don?t have sex. Or, if you do make this decision, have sex only with one
partner who you know doesn?t have HIV and is only having sex with you. The
more sex partners you have, the greater your chances are of getting HIV or
other diseases passed through sex.
- Use a latex condom every time you have sex, including oral and anal sex.
If you are allergic to latex, there is a polyurethane (a type of plastic)
condom that you can try. There also is a condom that women can use to
protect themselves. Don?t use lambskin condoms - they might not protect you
against HIV.
- Don?t share razors or toothbrushes because of the possibility of contact
with blood. If you are pregnant or think you might be soon, talk to a doctor
or your local health department about being tested for HIV. Drug treatments
are available to help you and reduce the chance of passing HIV to your baby
if you have it.
How do I know if I have HIV or AIDS?
You might have HIV and still feel perfectly healthy. The only way to know
for sure if you are infected or not is to be tested. Talk with a
knowledgeable health care provider or counselor both before and after you
are tested. You can go to your doctor or health department for testing or
buy a home collection kit (for testing for HIV antibodies) at many
pharmacies. To find out where to go in your area for HIV counseling and
testing, call your local health department or the CDC National AIDS Hotline,
at 1-800-342-AIDS (2437).
Your doctor or health care provider can give you a confidential HIV test.
The information on your HIV test and test results are confidential, just as
your other medical information. This means it can be shared only with people
authorized to see your medical records. You can ask your doctor, health care
provider, or HIV counselor at the place you are tested to explain who can
obtain this information. For example, you may want to ask whether your
insurance company could find out your HIV status if you make a claim for
health insurance benefits or apply for life insurance or disability
insurance.
In many states, you can be tested anonymously. These tests are usually given
at special places known as anonymous testing sites. When you get an
anonymous HIV test, the testing site records only a number or code with the
test result, not your name. A counselor gives you this number at the time
your blood, saliva, or urine is taken for the test, then you return to the
testing site (or perhaps call the testing site, for example with home
collection kits) and give them your number or code to learn the results of
your test.
You are more likely to test positive for (be infected with) HIV if you:
Have ever shared injection drug needles and syringes or "works." Have ever
had sex without a condom with someone who had HIV. Have ever had a sexually
transmitted disease, like chlamydia or gonorrhea. Received a blood
transfusion or a blood clotting factor between 1978 and 1985. Have ever had
sex with someone who has done any of those things
What can I do if the test shows I have HIV?
Although HIV is a very serious infection, many people with HIV and AIDS are
living longer, healthier lives today, thanks to new and effective
treatments. It is very important to make sure you have a doctor who knows
how to treat HIV. If you don?t know which doctor to use, talk with a health
care professional or trained HIV counselor. If you are pregnant or are
planning to become pregnant, this is especially important.
There also are other things you can do for yourself to stay healthy. Here
are a few:
Follow your doctor?s instructions. Keep your appointments. Your doctor may
prescribe medicine for you. Take the medicine just the way he or she tells
you to because taking only some of your medicine gives your HIV infection
more chance to grow. Get immunizations (shots) to prevent infections such as
pneumonia and flu. Your doctor will tell you when to get these shots. If you
smoke or if you use drugs not prescribed by your doctor, quit. Eat healthy
foods. This will help keep you strong, keep your energy and weight up, and
help your body protect itself. Exercise regularly to stay strong and fit.
Get enough sleep and rest.
How can I find out more about HIV and AIDS?
You can call the CDC National AIDS Hotline at 1-800-342-2437 (Spanish/
Español: 1-800-344-7432; TTY access: 1-800-243-7889). The Hotline is staffed
with people trained to answer your questions about HIV and AIDS in a prompt
and confidential manner. Staff at the Hotline can offer you a wide variety
of written materials and put you in touch with organizations in your area
that deal with HIV and AIDS.
On the Internet, you can get information on HIV and AIDS from the CDC
Division of HIV/ AIDS Prevention. Other sources of information are the CDC
National Prevention Information Network, or the HIV/ AIDS Treatment
Information Service.
For more information about HIV or AIDS, call:
CDC National Prevention Information Network
(800) 458-5231
1-301-562-1098 (International)
P.O. Box 6003
Rockville, MD 20849-6003
References
1. Is AIDS manmade?: The Strecker Memorandum. Distributed by The Strecker
Group, Eagle Rock, CA., 1983. 2. Jack Felder. (1989). AIDS: United States
Germs Warfare at its Best with Documents and Proof, 6. 3. Malcolm Turner.
(June 24, 1991). AIDS is Biological Warfare: A Warning to African People,
African Connection, 9. 4. Turner. (1991) and William Campbell Douglass,
(October 17, 1990) Who Murdered Africa, The Challenger, 25. 5. Douglass.
(1990), 25. 6. Turner. (1991), 25. 7. Is AIDS manmade?: The Strecker
Memorandum (1983). 8. William Campbell Douglass, (undated), Who Murdered
Africa: Organization unleashed killer disease on unsuspecting mankind in
biological boondoggle of the century. 9. (Undated). Is AIDS man-made?
Strecker Memorandum claims AIDS was created and deployed by scientists with
an on-going cover-up. Opinion expressed by Dr. Theodore A. Strecker on TV
program ?For the People.? 10. Pearce Wright. (May 1989). Smallpox vaccine
triggered AIDS virus,' Times, 25. 11. Wright. (1989). 12. Wright. (1989).
13. Douglass. (October 17, 1990). 14. Douglass. (1990). 15. Douglass.
(1990). 16. Turner. (1991). 17. AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry
Into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic. (1988). Aries Rising Press. 18.
Felder. (1989). 19. Douglass. (1990). 20. Federal Information Systems
Corporation, Federal News Service. (September 21, 1999). Speech by Pres.
Clinton to the 54th United Nations General Assembly, New York City. 21. 23
Ravi Nessman. (June 6, 2001). AIDS expert for U.N. warns epidemic is likely
to worsen. The Plain Dealer. 22. Angus Shaw. (September 16, 1999). U.N.
agency says AIDS scourge is making Africa a killer field'. The Plain Dealer,
7A. 23. Shaw. (1999). 24. Maggie Farley. (June 26, 2001). U.N. chief to
world: Face facts on AIDS. The Plain Dealer. 25. Donald G. McNeil. (December
16, 1998). AIDS epidemic alters Africa's culture of mourning. The Plain
Dealer. 26. Jim McDermott. (June 23, 1991). Asia-Epicenter of the AIDS
Epidemic. The Washington Post. 27. Jeannie Relly. (February 26, 2000). HIV
infections up in Caribbean. The Plain Dealer. 28. Emma Ross. (November 27,
1998). AIDS toll falling in Europe, study says. The Plain Dealer. 29.
Felder. (1989). 30. Felder. (1989). 31. Felder. (1989). 32. Felder. (1989).
33. Barbara Day. (June 20, 1991). Deadly Tuskegee syphilis study 40 years
later. The Capital Spotlight, 6. 34. Felder. (1989). 35. Felder. (1989). 36.
Felder. (1989). 37. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. (May 16,
1997). Remarks by the President in Apology for Study Done in Tuskegee, 2.
Excerpts of this essay are courtesy of Dr. Kwame Nantambu, an Associate
Professor, Dept. of Pan-African Studies, Kent State University, U.S.A.
AIDS man made - HR ( Congressional House Resolution) 15090 - July 9, 1969
* House Bill 15090 showing that the U.S. government asked for the AIDS virus to be made *
Category: Distorted Truth, Health1,185 views since January 8th, 2009 3:35 am
* House Bill 15090 showing that the U.S. government asked for the AIDS virus to be made The Development of the AIDS virus was funded in 1969 (three years before the request for development by the World Health Organization) through funds obtained by the United States Defense Department.
* The Defense Department requested and received $10 million via House Bill 15090, which was reviewed in Hearings before
the Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives
during the ninety-first Congress in review of the Defense Appropriations for 1970.
Part Five of H.B. 15090 was entitled RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION, sponsored by the Department of the Army, the Advanced Research Project Agency (now DARPA), and Defense Research and Engineering. The Feasibility program and laboratories were to have been completed by 1974 - 1975 and the virus between 1974 - 1979. The WHO started to inject AIDS - laced smallpox vaccine (Vaccina) into over 100 million Africans in 1977. Over 2000 young
white male homosexuals (Operation Trojan Horse) were injected with laced Hepatitis
B vaccine in 1978 through the Centers for Disease Control and the New York Blood
Center. The development of the virus apparently had a dual purpose: (1) As a
political / ethnic weapon to be used against black individuals and (2) one of the
programmed efforts at de-population.
The session of the Subcommittee that took place on July 1, 1969 involved
discussions about Synthetic Biological Agents. Part of the congressional narrative
(from HB 15090) is detailed below:
"There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and many eminent biologist believe that within a period of 5 - 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired." Mr. Sikes: Are we doing any work in that field?
Dr. MacArthur: We are not.
Mr. Sikes: Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?
Dr. MacArthur: Certainly not lack of interest.
Mr. Sikes: Would you provide for our record information on what would be required,
what the advantages of such a program would be, the time and the cost involved? Dr. MacArthur: We will be very happy to. The dramatic progress being made in the
field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of
science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and
provided the following observations:
1. All biological agents up to the present time are representatives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes. 2. Within the next 5 - 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new
infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any
known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be
refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to
maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.
3. A research program to explore the feasibility to this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a cost of $10 million. 4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. The science of
molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent
scientists in the field. Almost all are in university laboratories and they are
general adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was
considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy
of Sciences National Research Council (NAS-NRC). The matter was discussed with
NAS-NRC and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However, decreasing
funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program, and our reluctance to involve
the NAS-NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the
past 2 years. It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe
such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of
massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure
scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the
ways it could be done, there is little that can be done to devise defensive
measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an
important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is
no adequate research program.
Actual creation of the virus was done through the Department of the Army at Fort
George Meade and through the Department of Navy. The name of the individual who
was head of the Naval development program is known but will not be released at
this time.
Category: Distorted Truth, Health1,185 views since January 8th, 2009 3:35 am
* House Bill 15090 showing that the U.S. government asked for the AIDS virus to be made The Development of the AIDS virus was funded in 1969 (three years before the request for development by the World Health Organization) through funds obtained by the United States Defense Department.
* The Defense Department requested and received $10 million via House Bill 15090, which was reviewed in Hearings before
the Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives
during the ninety-first Congress in review of the Defense Appropriations for 1970.
Part Five of H.B. 15090 was entitled RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION, sponsored by the Department of the Army, the Advanced Research Project Agency (now DARPA), and Defense Research and Engineering. The Feasibility program and laboratories were to have been completed by 1974 - 1975 and the virus between 1974 - 1979. The WHO started to inject AIDS - laced smallpox vaccine (Vaccina) into over 100 million Africans in 1977. Over 2000 young
white male homosexuals (Operation Trojan Horse) were injected with laced Hepatitis
B vaccine in 1978 through the Centers for Disease Control and the New York Blood
Center. The development of the virus apparently had a dual purpose: (1) As a
political / ethnic weapon to be used against black individuals and (2) one of the
programmed efforts at de-population.
The session of the Subcommittee that took place on July 1, 1969 involved
discussions about Synthetic Biological Agents. Part of the congressional narrative
(from HB 15090) is detailed below:
"There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and many eminent biologist believe that within a period of 5 - 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired." Mr. Sikes: Are we doing any work in that field?
Dr. MacArthur: We are not.
Mr. Sikes: Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?
Dr. MacArthur: Certainly not lack of interest.
Mr. Sikes: Would you provide for our record information on what would be required,
what the advantages of such a program would be, the time and the cost involved? Dr. MacArthur: We will be very happy to. The dramatic progress being made in the
field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of
science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and
provided the following observations:
1. All biological agents up to the present time are representatives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes. 2. Within the next 5 - 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new
infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any
known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be
refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to
maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.
3. A research program to explore the feasibility to this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a cost of $10 million. 4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. The science of
molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent
scientists in the field. Almost all are in university laboratories and they are
general adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was
considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy
of Sciences National Research Council (NAS-NRC). The matter was discussed with
NAS-NRC and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However, decreasing
funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program, and our reluctance to involve
the NAS-NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the
past 2 years. It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe
such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of
massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure
scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the
ways it could be done, there is little that can be done to devise defensive
measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an
important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is
no adequate research program.
Actual creation of the virus was done through the Department of the Army at Fort
George Meade and through the Department of Navy. The name of the individual who
was head of the Naval development program is known but will not be released at
this time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)