PLANS TO SCRAP WTC TOWERS IN 1989.

Plans To Scrap WTC Towers For $5.6 Bn In 1989! From Karl W. B. Schwarz kw.schwarz@worldnet.att.net 12-6-4 To Jimmy Walter Hi Jimmy, your comment completely misses the point. That is why, in 1989, they planned a $5.6 billion takedown and rebuild, it was tanked. The witness came to me...and we are protecting them. The building had the structural equivalent of osteoporosis. I am about to fund $25-50 million to THE LAWSUIT - United States Citizens v United States Government. Something major happened over the past several days. Karl -----Original Message----- From: Jimmy Walter Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 12:49 PM To: 'Karl W. B. Schwarz' Subject: RE: galvanic versus flying beams No amount of galvanic action will hurl steel beams straight out horizontally and cause the building to fall at the speed of gravity. However, it would be cause for insurance fraud! But keep trying _____ From: Karl W. B. Schwarz Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 1:22 PM To: Jimmy Walter Hello Jimmy You are going to wind up owing me the $100,000. :-) The Statute of Liberty had to be repaired due to galvanic corrosion in air. Not what most think is possible but in ocean environments, very possible. Normally galvanic corrosion is only a factor in an electrolyte such as sea water and the stern drive on the boat - having steel and aluminum components - erodes, turns brittle and snap - it fails - if electrolytic grounding plates are not installed. """The galvanic reaction between iron and copper was originally mitigated by insulating copper from the iron framework using an asbestos cloth soaked in shellac. However, the integrity and sealing property of this improvised insulator broke down over the many years of exposure to high levels of humidity normal in a marine environment. The insulating barrier became a sponge that kept the salted water present as a conductive electrolyte, forming a crude electrochemical cell as Volta had discovered a century earlier.""" In 1989 - there were plans to erect scaffolding and disassemble the WTC towers and rebuild them. Cost projection was around $5.6 billion. One of the architects shows up to work one day and the MIB's were there - had confiscated all of the plans, specs, details, etc for WTC. They even confiscated their office cubicles and had tape on the floor outlining where they went. Reason - the exterior cast aluminum WTC panels had been directly connected to the steel superstructure of the building, thus causing galvanic corrosion. In short, the "life cycle" of the WTC was not 200 - 300 years, more like 30 years or so. The exterior skin of the building - in being aluminum and connected directly to the super structure - was making the building weaker every day. That could explain why there appears to be explosives set only about every 25 floors. Once the failure started, the brittleness of welds, rivets, bolts, etc would fail much easier as the loads became progressively greater on the way down. That same process would also explain why the concrete was "powderized" over time because electrolytic processes weaken concrete too by "debonding" the Portland that causes concrete to bond in the first place. However, bear in mind that the "concrete floors" were not load bearing reinforced concrete. They were supported by what was a weakening by the day superstructure and cross members. There was a 1989 meeting and the folks at the architectural firm [Emory Roth, the project architect that took over after the design architects completed the conceptual drawings] that had their office, records, plans and specs seized - were told that the $5.6 billion "take it down, rebuild it" project was cancelled and in about "10-12 years" they would "blow it up and start over". Consider that - and consider that NYC and the US Govt could not stand the global embarrassment of being so stupid or negligent that they did not consider the effects of galvanic corrosion on the superstructure. That is structural design 101 in architectural school and why they want architects to take physics and chemistry for Christ's sake. I did. I am an architect by the way, quit practicing in 1988. http://www.npl.co.uk/ncs/docs/the_electochemistry_of_corrosion_figures.p df http://www.npl.co.uk/ncs/docs/the_electochemistry_of_corrosion.pdf http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Aircraft/galvdefi.htm see bimetallic corrosion to get to the two links above http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Landmarks/statue-saddle.htm Guess what? The fat lady HAS SUNG. You know, the one in New York Harbor with the torch of Liberty and Freedom held high. I want to find the sick bastard that thought it would be a cute idea to have close to 3,000 in the building and use that as an excuse to go take on a whole new energy policy, war policy, and lining the pockets of just certain people. I think a Statute of Liberty hanging for that person would be most appropriate. best regards, Karl W. B. Schwarz President, Chief Executive Officer Patmos Nanotechnologies, LLC

FLIGHT 93 LANDED SAFELY AT CLEVELAND HOPKINS AIRPORT.

UAL Flight 93 Landed Safely At Cleveland Hopkins Airport Plane Lands In Cleveland - Bomb Feared Aboard 8-7-4 Reported by 9News Staff Web produced by:Liz Foreman 9/11/01 11:43:57 AM A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White. White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated. United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did not say how many people were aboard the flight. United said it was also "deeply concerned" about another flight, Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which was bound from Boston to Los Angeles. On behalf of the airline CEO James Goodwin said: "The thoughts of everyone at United are with the passengers and crew of these flights. Our prayers are also with everyone on the ground who may have been involved. "United is working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain further information on these flights," he said. ______ Reply to email commenting on Flight 93 using link http://www.wcpo.com/specials/2001/americaattacked/news_local/story14.html No Body Parts Found At Flt 93 Crash Scene http://www.flight93crash.com/flight93_secondary_debris_field.html#2nd http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=193 better: http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/print.php?storyid=193 Dulce Decorum Dulce still points out, that something is odd with the serial numbers of Flight93 and Flight 175. The serial numbers of the ORIGINAL planes are SAME serial numbers of the planes that ARE STILL FLYING. 591UA and 612UA. Dulce argues, that though N-number can be transferred, the manufacturer serial number CANNOT be transferred. According to some spot-witnesses, Boeing 757-222 SERIAL NUMBER 28142 is flying around Chicago under the alias 594UA. According to the FAA, N594UA Boeing 757-222 flies now with a DIFFERENT serial number, namely 28145. Something is fishy.

* SENSATIONAL FND IN RUSSIA . . ALIEN EVIDENCE . . ? *

** ( Sorry - The photos didn't upload correctly . . will get it fixed . . ) **
figure1.jpg (9612 bytes)

figure2.jpg (10464 bytes)



micro2.gif (18174 bytes)

figure3.jpg (14253 bytes)
Source:

http://home.fireplug.net/%7Ershand/streams/science/russcrew.html

Translation by George Sassoon
Lochbuie, Isle of Mull, PA62 6AA, Scotland
and 2 Campbell Place, Sutton Veny, Wilts BA12 7SA
tels. 01680-814261 and 01985-840205
From: Ancient Skies, German Edition 2/19/97,
CH-3803 Beatenburg, Switzerland

SENSATIONAL FIND IN RUSSIA

By Hartwig Hausdorf
Frank-Caro-Str. 94a, D - 84518, Garching-a.d.Alz, Germany

The question as to whether or not we have received visitors from space can probably only be answered with certainty if and when we find indisputable evidence for such a visit here on Earth. Such a proof could consist of the discovery of artifacts whose exact age can be determined, and whose external and internal structure can be regarded as "time-anomalous". In recent years numerous micro-objects have been found in the Urals, which appear to fulfill these requirements. This is the first published report of the discovery.

For many years now, researchers in our field have been suggesting that
artifacts left by extraterrestrial visitors might be found in geological
deposits. Much evidence has been found, principally by Dr. Johannes Fiebag (1, 2), from apparently paradoxical events in the Earth's history, that genetic manipulation experiments have been carried out over hundreds of millions of years by extraterrestrial, which culminated in the creation of us humans.

Unfortunately for us, any discovery of possibly technical artifacts from
ancient times would seem to be very unlikely. For the geological events of
only the last million years are documented today in a mere few centimeters of sedimentary strata. Even as regards very recent events - I am thinking of the end of the Second World War - we aware of how quickly technical objects can disappear. Weapons, ammunition, and even large finds are already almost completely rusted away and disintegrating.

In view of this, the finds made recently in Russia are all the more
astonishing. In the years 1991-1993, gold prospectors on the small river
Narada, on the eastern side of the Ural mountains, have found unusual,
mostly spiral-shaped objects. The size of these things ranges from a
maximum of 3 cm (1.2 in.) down to an incredible 0.003 mm, about 1/10,000th of an inch! To date, these inexplicable artifacts have been found in their thousands at various sites near the rivers Narada, Kozhim, and Balbanyu, and also by two smaller streams named Vtvisty and Lapkhevozh, mostly at depths between 3 and 12 meters (10 and 40 ft.)

The spiral-form objects are composed of various metals: the larger ones are of copper, while the small and very small ones are of the rare metals
tungsten and molybdenum. Tungsten has a high atomic weight, and is also
very dense, with a melting point of 3410 deg. C (6100 deg. F). It is used
principally for the hardening of special steels, and in unalloyed form for
the filaments of light bulbs. Molybdenum also has a high density, and a
respectable melting point of 2650 deg. C (4740 deg. F). This metal too is
used for hardening steels and giving them corrosion-resistant properties,
these being used principally for highly-stressed weapon parts and vehicle
armor.

At the present time, these more-than-mysterious objects are being
investigated by the Russian Academy of Sciences in Syktyvka (capital city of the former Soviet Republic of Komi), Moscow, St. Petersburg, and also a scientific institute in Helsinki, Finland. Exact measurements of these often microscopically-small objects have shown that the dimensions of the spirals are in the so-called Golden Mean ratio. Since ancient classical times this fraction has been the "iron rule" in architecture and geometry. Its usefulness is in the fact that if a certain length is divided into two using this ratio, the ratio of the original length to the larger piece is
the same as that of the larger piece to the smaller piece.

Quite apart from such subtleties, these objects are obviously the product
of an inexplicable and highly advanced technology; they bear remarkable
resemblances to control elements used in micro-miniature devices in our
very latest technology, so-called nanomachines. This technology is still in
its infancy with us, but already engineers are thinking of applications
which are pure science-fiction. Among other things, they envisage
constructing micro-probes for use in medicine which can be implanted, such as for carrying out operations inside blood vessels which are not possible with present surgical techniques.

What was the purpose of this object, illustrated here in 100x and again in
500x magnification? (Figs 2, 3). Fig. 1 shows another object in its
entirety over a scale-bar 200 microns wide (8/1000ths inch)! All tests
carried out to date give an age for the objects of between 20,000 and
318,000 years, depending on the depth and the situation of the site. (3, 4)
But even if it was only a mere 2,000 or 20,000 years, we are faced with the inevitable question: who, of all the people in the world, was at that time capable of creating such superfine micro-filigree objects, something which our own technology is only now just beginning to achieve?

ICE-AGE NANOTECHNOLOGY

Literature

1. FIEBAG J., Das Raetsel der Ediacara-Fauna (The puzzle of the Ediacara Fauna) in: Daeniken E.v. (Ed.) Kosmische Spuren, Munich, 1988.
2. FIEBAG J., Das Genesis-Projekt, in: Dopatka, U. (Ed.) Sind wir allein? (Are we alone?), Duesseldorf 1996
3. HAUSDORF H. Wenn Goetter Gott spielen (When Gods play God), Munich, 1997
4. OUVAROV V. Personal letter to H. Hausdorf of 2 October 1996.

Dr. Johannes Fiebag can be reached at:
jo.fiebag@t-online.de
Findings by geologits indicate possibility of extraterrestrial origin for
microbjects.

** THE SURPRISING *PNAC* CONNECTION TO LIBYA **

** THE SURPRISING PNAC CONNECTION TO LIBYA **

by Zen Gardner
March 21st, 2011

* Looks like the PNAC, or Project for A New American Century, agenda of 1997 is rolling along as planned. Just as has been outlined by other think tanks, Illuminati writers and social programmers.

* But a blind world reels on the defensive when they could have known what was coming all along. Notice, mind you, that the portrayal of an unstable middle east includes every “rogue” nation BUT Israel. Israel oddly enough is never “on the table” for discussion, when in fact they are the fomentors and co-creators of the entire “terrorist” threat fabrication.

Recent Developments

If you want to know exactly what’s happening or about to transpire, keep an eye on Neocons like Bill Kristol at rabid Zionist Murdock’s Fox News, the former head of PNAC when they made their famous study, proposal and ‘Statement of Principles’ preceding the staged 9/11 events and ensuing bogus “war on terror”.

It looks like despite Obama’s “promises” to not send troops, we’re about do it anyway. Surprise. So expect a real good reason to be fabricated soon, like tales of horrific atrocities by Gaddafi, to make sure the public is behind it. A false flag or two within Libya is probably on the table right now, like the staged theatre fire massacre in Abadan, Iran during the Iran revolution.

Kristol “Announces” the Plan

Here’s Kristol’s “announcement” that “we will not leave Gaddafi in power”:

(Raw Story) The operation to create a no-fly zone in Libya has just begun, but already conservative Fox News pundit Bill Kristol is wishing the U.S. would send in ground troops “sooner rather than later.”

U.S. President Barack Obama said Saturday the “Odyssey Dawn” operation launched under a UN Security Council resolution was a “limited military action,” unlike the regime change aims of the war against Iraqi president Saddam Hussein.

He pledged no U.S. troops would be deployed on the ground.

Fox News Chris Wallace asked Kristol Sunday if it was a mistake to limit the mission in Libya.

“Let’s talk about the mission,” Wallace began. “You heard Admiral Mullen, earlier in the show, say his orders are clear: protect the civilians, don’t overthrow Gaddafi. That’s not the point. Is that a mistake? Can we live with Gaddafi in any sort of power? He can create a lot of trouble.”

“No, we cannot leave Gaddafi in power,” Kristol agreed. “And we won’t leave Gaddafi in power.”

“The immediate military mission, Admiral Mullen correctly described but the political goal is to remove Gaddafi and ultimately military assets will serve that political goal.” (source)

Bastard comes to mind.

PNAC- Project for a New American Century Agenda Rolls On

If you’ve done your homework you know this neocon “think tank” led by Kristol at the turn of the century announced their intentions to militarize the US and roll on through the middle east towards global hegemony. Almost all signatories of the PNAC Statement were also members of the Council on Foreign Relations, the admitted steering committee on U.S. policy.

However, they needed to galvanize the American people behind such a move.

“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”.

What has transpired since 9/11 has been an ongoing fulfillment of their plan. See the original document for yourself and decide if all that’s transpiring now isn’t a fulfullment of their Statement of Principles.

http://www.theindyvoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/project-new-american-century.jpg

To Summarize the PNAC Goals in their own words in 1997: (emphasis mine)

We seem to have forgotten the essential elements of the Reagan Administration’s success: a military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges; a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American principles abroad; and national leadership that accepts the United States’ global responsibilities.

Of course, the United States must be prudent in how it exercises its power. But we cannot safely avoid the responsibilities of global leadership or the costs that are associated with its exercise. America has a vital role in maintaining peace and security in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. If we shirk our responsibilities, we invite challenges to our fundamental interests. The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire. The history of this century should have taught us to embrace the cause of American leadership.

Our aim is to remind Americans of these lessons and to draw their consequences for today. Here are four consequences:

• we need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global
responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future;

• we need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values;

<• we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad;

• we need to accept responsibility for America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.

How terribly altruistic and unselfish of them. Unbelievably Machiavellian yet the world is forced to swallow it.

PNAC Checklist Almost Complete

Let’s see how they’re faring on the above-stated agenda:

* Increase defense spending: CHECK. “in the past 10 years, defense spending has accounted for two-thirds of the growth in (government) discretionary spending.” (Source) Astronomical defense (war) spending is not only killing the American economy, but its unwitting soldiers and millions of innocent foreign nationals.
* Challenge Regimes: CHECK. “if you’re not with us, you’re with the terrorists”. Is that broad enough? How many countries has the U.S. machine invaded, bombed, poisoned, infiltrated and subverted in the past 10-14 years alone…never mind the rest of its sordid history?
* Promote political and economic freedom abroad. CHECK. Multinationals just about have full global sway and control as sovereign economies are sacrificed to the Globalist banking cabal. What freedom–for them. As for political freedom, the whole world’s practically on lock down now, thanks to the bogus Orwellian “war on terror”.
* Extend an international order friendly to OUR security, OUR prosperity, and OUR principles. CHECK. And to hell with what anyone else says or thinks.

The Importance of the Move to take Libya

Most people do not realize the historical strategic importance of Libya in the Middle East and Europe. More will be coming out about this as the days play out, but here’s a few points to ponder:

Libya is not peripheral to the world system. It is at its very core. Libya possesses 1,800 kilometers of Mediterranean coastline. The country produces 2 percent of the world’s oil, with 85 percent of exports going to Europe. Libyan nationals have been prominent jihadists in Iraq. Since the beginning of the Great Recession and the slump in global demand in 2008, Libya has allocated $200 billion toward new infrastructure spending.

This same article goes on to tell us exactly WHY Libya is so important and vital to U.S. and globalist interests:

But a brief review of Libya’s history demonstrates that Britain, France, Italy, Russia, the United Nations, and the United States have long had a great deal at stake in Libya, even before oil was discovered in 1959. Today, it is a paramount American interest that Libya not return to being a rogue state or descend into civil war. If Libyan leader Muammar al-Gadhafi reasserts control over the east or even if he fails and the country is cleaved in two, U.S. interests in the region would suffer a major setback.

What makes Libya so important? Any real estate agent could tell you: location, location, location. Control of the country has always been a remarkably effective way to project power into Egypt, the Mediterranean, and beyond. Similarly, denying a hostile power (be it the Soviet Union, Muammar al-Gadhafi, or terrorists) the ability to destabilize surrounding countries from Libyan territory has been a consistent thread in U.S. policy since the end of World War II. (more history of the region with NPR spin HERE)



Epilogue

It’s clear this is going down fast and emphatically. The work to gain supposed “international consensus” via the UN was quicker and more decisive and far reaching than any international policing move on their part.

That says a lot. While most of the world knows it’s mainly once again a U.S. aggression to keep consolidating its hold on the Middle East, the message is clearer daily that a global police force is being positioned in the world’s mind.

Expect to see a lot more of that. It’s in the language, positioning and rhetoric.

It’s propaganda warfare most of all. And ushering in the New World Order is their main objective.

I’ll end with an apt quote:

This “War on Terror” is 100% absolute, utter theater. The very people making trillions from the wars are now purposefully generating hatred, division and animosity to continue their lucrative genocide and continue their designs of world domination they openly write about.

The danger when confronted with a news story, especially a controversial one, by not asking yourself the important questions, is being forever trapped in a false paradigm. A cage not of steel, but of your own ignorance. One within which you may send your son off to die because you fell for absolute utter theater put on by a single organization with soulless scum posing in different masks on opposing sides. Always click “About Us” and never settle on a conclusion until you have all the facts. Knowledge is power; that is not a cliche that is literally the difference between freedom and slavery, life and death. Source

Keep your eyes peeled and heart open,

Zen

www.zengardner.com

* THE LIBYAN WAR: UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND ILLEGITIMATE . . . **

To some, what Ghadafi is doing to his people is simply enforcing the provincial and governmental patriotic laws - by using deadly force against domestic enemy combatants who threaten regime change in his country . . .
What if, tomorrow, three million people decided to become 'active protesters' in the United States, and begin to march against the utterly corrupt U.S. government? What if they refused to 'go away' and local police, National Guard, and Army Reserve troops began to use force against said 'protesters'? Could we then, logically, expect countries like Russia and China to 'do the right thing' - to band together militarily, and attack sensitive strategic military and aviation installations all across the U.S. - to simply prevent the 'violent atrocities' being committed by the U.S. government against innocent Americans?


** The Anglo-French-American attack in North Africa is opposed by countries representing 40 percent of the human race
By Michael Lind

*

** The Libyan war: Unconstitutional and illegitimate
AP

** There is no doubt that U.S. participation in the Anglo-French-American attack on Libya is completely unconstitutional. As Glenn Greenwald has pointed out, before becoming president Barack Obama, a graduate of Harvard Law School and a former law professor, accurately described the limits of a president’s authority to initiate a war in cases where the U.S. has neither been attacked nor is in imminent danger of attack:

The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.

As Commander-in-Chief, the President does have a duty to protect and defend the United States. In instances of self-defense, the President would be within his constitutional authority to act before advising Congress or seeking its consent.

The civil war in Libya is a perfect case of "a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation." While the president is limited by the Constitution to repelling or forestalling attack, Congress can declare war for a variety of purposes beyond simple defense. But as a member of the United Nations, the U.S. must abide by the provisions of the U.N. Charter.

The provisions of the Charter are ambiguous, but the soundest interpretation is that under Article 51 countries can wage wars of national or regional self-defense without the approval of the U.N. Security Council. However, under Article 42, Security Council approval is necessary for wars undertaken for other, non-defensive purposes.

It is not clear whether there are limits on what kinds of military actions, in addition to wars of self-defense, that the Security Council can authorize, to deal with a "threat to peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression," as described in Article 39. The Security Council was designed to act as a great power concert capable of intervening to nip international crises in the bud. Whether one thinks it is prudent or not, intervention in the Libyan civil war, in order to avert, say, floods of refugees spilling over the borders or washing up on the shores of southern Europe, would seem to be the sort of thing the Security Council has the power to authorize.

However, while the Security Council can authorize member states to undertake a war for purposes other than national or regional self-defense, it cannot order any country to do so. The U.S. agreed to participate in the United Nations only because the U.N. charter makes it clear that each member state has the right to decide, on the basis of its internal constitutional processes, whether to take part in an enforcement action authorized by the Security Council.

In other words, there are two distinct systems of authorization, one international and one national. Under international law, the U.S. lacks the authority to engage in wars unrelated to its own defense or that of its allies. Security Council action might lift that legal restraint. But once the Security Council has acted, Congress must still authorize the military action by formal voting, not by mere "consultation" with the president.

The U.S. stayed out of the League of Nations after World War I in part because critics argued that it transferred the power to send the U.S. to war from Congress to an international body. Critics of U.S. participation in the United Nations after World War II similarly argued that the result would be presidential wars authorized by the U.N. but not by Congress.

By taking part in a war unrelated to American defense on the basis of a U.N. Security Council resolution, without asking the House and the Senate for a joint resolution as the basis of his authority, President Obama has validated the fears of the critics that U.S. participation in the United Nations would informally amend the Constitution, by transferring authority to initiate all kinds of wars from Congress to the president. The argument that Congress, merely by funding the military, approves of wars initiated without congressional authorization, cannot be taken seriously.

This is not the first unconstitutional war in American history. Truman’s Korean war and Clinton’s Kosovo war and his invasion of Haiti were all waged without congressional authorization (the Vietnam War was authorized by the Southeast Asia Resolution or “Gulf of Tonkin” Resolution). In contrast, Ronald Reagan obtained a congressional joint resolution authorizing his brief intervention in Lebanon (September 29, 1983), George Herbert Walker won a congressional joint resolution in favor of the Gulf War on January 12, 1991, while his son George W. Bush similarly obtained congressional authorization for the Afghan War (September 14, 2001) and the Iraq War (October 16, 2002). Unconstitutional wars waged without authorization by Congress and justified in the name of this or that international diplomatic body -- the UN, the Organization of American States, or in the case of the Libyan war the Arab League -- seem to be a specialty of "internationalist" Democratic presidents like Truman, Clinton and Obama.

In the case of the Libyan war, the presidential power grab is even more blatant, because weak, poor countries on the Security Council have acted as ventriloquists’ puppets for the U.S., Britain and France.

When the U.N. was being designed during World War II, Franklin Roosevelt initially wanted membership in the Security Council to be limited to three or four great powers, like the U.S., Britain, the Soviet Union and nationalist China. Unfortunately, in its final form, the authority of the great powers in the Security Council was diluted by rotating membership for various lesser powers. In addition to the five permanent members of the Security Council -- the U.S., Britain, France, Russia and China -- there are, at any given time, ten temporary members. Only a permanent member can veto a U.N. Security Council resolution, but the temporary members are permitted to vote as equals of the permanent members.

Why this matters is evident from the pattern of the U.N. Security Council vote that authorized the no-fly zones in Libya. At present the U.N. Security Council is made up of the five permanent members plus ten other countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Colombia, Germany, India, Gabon, Lebanon, Nigeria, Portugal, South Africa.

Of the members of the Security Council other than the permanent five, only Germany and possibly India and Brazil can be described as actual or potential great powers. Several of today’s temporary U.N. Security Council members are hardly countries at all. Lebanon’s government controls only part of its territory. Gabon is a statelet with a mere 1.6 million people, smaller than many American cities.

In the vote to authorize war against Libya, the U.S., Britain and France were joined by Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia, Gabon, Lebanon, Nigeria, Portugal and South Africa. Abstaining from the vote were five countries: Brazil, Russia, India, China and Germany.

What do the five countries that registered their opposition to the Libyan war have in common? They make up most of the great powers of the early twenty-first century. A few years back, Goldman Sachs identified the so-called "BRIC’s" -- Brazil, Russia, India and China -- as the most important emerging countries in the world. The opponents of the Libyan war on the Security Council are the BRIC’s plus Germany, the most populous and richest country in Europe.

Including the United States, the Security Council nations that voted for the no-fly zone resolution have a combined population of a little more than 700 million people and a combined GDP, in terms of purchasing power parity, of roughly $20 trillion. The Security Council countries that showed their disapproval of the Libyan war by abstaining from the vote have a combined population of about 3 billion people and a GDP of around $21 trillion.

If the U.S. is factored out, the disproportion between the pro-war and anti-war camps on the Security Council is even more striking. The countries that abstained from the vote account for more than 40 percent of the human race. The countries that joined the U.S. in voting to authorize attacks on Libya, including Britain and France, have a combined population that adds up to a little more than 5 percent of the human race.

The truth is that the U.S. is joined in its war on Libya by only two second-rank great powers, Britain and France, which between them carved up North Africa and the Middle East a century ago, slaughtering and torturing many Arabs in the process. Every other major power on earth (with the exception of Japan, which is not on the Council and has been quiet) opposed the Anglo-French-American attack in North Africa, registering that opposition by abstentions rather than "no" votes in the Security Council.

The U.S., along with Britain and France, won the Security Council vote in the face of opposition from China, Russia, Germany, India and Brazil only by rounding up the votes of various minor countries, including Gabon and Lebanon and Colombia and Portugal. If the U.S. promised favors to these weak nations in return for pro-war votes, it would not be the first time in the history of American diplomacy. In any event, the claim that the international community supports the war cannot be sustained, in the face of the opposition of the BRIC’s plus Germany.

And what of the alleged moral authority provided by the Arab League? A week after calling on the UN to impose a no-fly zone on Libya, the Arab League reversed its position, once western bombs began to rain down on an Arab country. Explaining the reversal, Amr Mussa, the secretary general of the Arab League, said: "What has happened in Libya differs from the goal of imposing a no-fly zone and what we want is the protection of civilians and not bombing other civilians."

In his press conference last Friday, President Obama told the American people: "Yesterday, in response to a call for action by the Libyan people and the Arab League, the U.N. Security Council passed a strong resolution that demands an end to the violence against citizens." It is bad enough that the President thinks that a declaration of war by Congress is not necessary, as long as the war is blessed by Security Council members like Colombia and Gabon, as well as by "the Libyan people" and by the collection of kleptocrats and thugs that make up the Arab League. But when the Arab League withdraws its support as soon as the war begins -- well, that’s just embarrassing.

* THE REAL REASON BODY SCANNERS ARE IN AIRPORTS - AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SAFETY *

** No wonder Michael Chertoff wants body scanners in airports - He’s paid by the companies who make them. **

Mainstream news, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, Fox represent corporations
Why aren’t the mainstream media reporters at CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, and Fox News reporting this? TV reporters these days are such corporate shills. Most look like models but are stupid and arrogant, and don’t ask any significant questions.

That’s why alternative news media is such a big search on the internet, because mainstream media is usually a bunch of models covering info-tainment or a shouting match between Republicans and Democrats, when the reality is that the corporations control both parties. Corporations also control mainstream news media.

Why Michael Chertoff is a scumbag
Michael Chertoff pretends to care about security, pushing for the use of airport scanners. But his real reason for pushing for the use of airport scanners is that he makes money from them. Michael Chertoff is a scum bag.

** Here are some links that prove Michael Chertoff makes money from the use of airport scanners: **










* ANYBODY CATCHING THE DRIFT HERE? *

* Summary **

*If you continue to fly and let the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) harass you by groping your body, making you walk through a radiation emitting body scanner, or both, then that is your choice. By doing this however, you are volunteering to be a frog in a slow boiling pot, one in which your liberties are being lost little by little, as the heat that was once comfortable becomes the water that eventually cooks you.

Think about this.

The next time you decide to be groped by TSA, walk through a radiation emitting body scanner or both, you are allowing your freedoms to be taken away.

You can opt out of this, by boycotting these procedures by not flying.

Drive. Take a train. You have choices. Take them. Stand up for yourself.

Value your freedom by opting out of these invasive violations of your God given rights.

If you want to send a clear message to the idiots at the TSA, and the scum bag Michael Chertoff who is making a lot of money from these body scanners, then vote with your feet and vote with your wallet.

Don’t fly until the TSA is abolished and the body scanners are removed from airports.

* MESSENGER BACTERIA COULD 'TWEET' DIRECTIONS TO NANOBOTS . . . **

(On a personal note: Did you read that title? And, uh (chuckle) I simply can't believe that there's people in this day and this age that do not believe in . . God. Yes, God. I know that particular name/title is not flattering, that it has become a 'dirty' word to many of us here in the west, but that's exactly the way those currently in power want it to be . . to sound. Precisely so we . . will not believe. Duh . . . )
** We, the silly little humans that we are, have barely had electricity for even a hundred years - step back for just a moment, really; pause for just a second - since that's how long it should only take a halfway intelligent person, and think . . we have only had electricity for barely a century, and look at what we are capable of. What, might you imagine, are those that have had various forms of electrical generating power for lets say, hmm - TWENTY THOUSAND YEARS - capable of? A MILLION YEARS? One can only imagine . . how about trying for a second? **

** Okay, this one's a little complicated, but super cool. So, hang with me. **

*Doctors would really like to fight diseases such a cancer in precise, directed ways. That means delivering cancer-killing therapies to ugly cells, while leaving healthy cells alone. One way that could happen in the future is by using super tiny robots -- nanobots -- that work together inside the body like an infantry of warriors armed to battle cancer.

*But there are some big challenges. Among them, communication. Like any battlefield army, soldiers need to coordinate their attacks. And nanobots, in theory, would have a difficult time. They can't use nano-sized cell phones, for example, because radio signals don't travel through liquids. (What about sonar? Has anyone looked into nano-sonar?) And chemical forms of communications only seem to work over long distances.

*So, a team from the Polytechnic University of Catalonia in Barcelona, Spain, are looking at a way to use bacteria as messengers that deliver instructions to nanobots wrapped in DNA. Researchers Maria Gregori and Ignacio Llatser encoded the cytoplasm of non-pathogenic strain of E. coli with a short DNA sequence. Think of it as a tweet.

*Here's how it might work: A scout-like nanobot in the body encounters a cancerous tumor. It wants to call over the troops for an attack, so it releases bacteria encoded with packets of information in the form of DNA. The bacteria swim towards soldier nanobots, where they attach to the nanobots and then download their DNA message. Orders in hand, the nanobots arm their attack.

*It's way cool, but keep in mind this is all theory and simulation. In the simulation, bacteria equipped with flagella -- whip-like tails that propel them forward -- took about 6 minutes to travel 1 millimeter. And the amount of data they carried in DNA is equal to about 600 kilobits of information. That's 3G, which provides typical download speeds of 600 kilobits to 1.4 Megabits per second . . .

THE SECRET SEX LIFE OF JOHN TRAVOLTA.

Scientology. Pfff . . .

** The Secret Sex Life of John Travolta **

Author Robert Randolph has been talking to the tabloids about John Travolta's habit of hooking up with men at Los Angeles saunas. Most media outlets, however, were too shy to delve into the steamy details. We're not quite as timid.

Randolph, an interior designer by trade, says he first started visiting LA's City Spa in 1995. It wasn't long, he claims, before he encountered fellow member and notorious closet case John Travolta, who frequented the spa to hook up with other men. He's publishing an account of his run-ins with Travolta—and a number of other celebrities—on the spa scene in a self-published book entitled You'll Never Spa in This Town Again, which you can pre-order on his website. In recent weeks, Randolph has been busy talking with tabloids such as the National Enquirer and Star, about what he witnessed. (He says the Enquirer even subjected him to a lie detector test, which he says he passed with flying (rainbow) colors.) But mainstream tabloids have generally been skittish about printing some of the more explicit details from Randolph's days on the spa circuit.

Randolph says his first encounter with Travolta, who was then in his early 40s, took place in one of the spa's steam rooms.

"I walked in and the guy was giving John a blowjob and, like guys do, he pulled his head up when I walked in. Then they left the room," Randolph described Travolta's mate as a "very handsome, very hung" Middle-Eastern man. "I decided to follow them. There was an empty massage room upstairs where guys could go and have sex. I followed them up there and I went in the next room where I normally got my massages, and I watched them have sex. Full-blown sex. Anal." In case you're wondering, Travolta is a bottom.

It was after he'd seen Travolta getting it on with numerous men at the spa that Randolph had a run-in of his own.

"We were both next to each other in the steam room and he started stroking his dick. It was hard," Randolph says. "He undid my towel and said, 'Let's have some fun.' I said no. I told him I wasn't comfortable."

There's nothing wrong with hooking up with guys in bathhouses; we firmly believe that consenting adults should have as much sex as humanly possible. But Travolta's salacious trips to steam rooms are a little unusual considering the circumstances. Not only has he been married to Kelly Preston since 1991 (and fathered three children with her, including one that died and one that's about to be born any day now), he's also a prominent member of the Church of Scientology, which believes in "curing" people of their homosexuality. Critics of the church claim that information culled during "auditing sessions"—a process in which members clear themselves of "negative influences" and occasionally brings up details of sexual liaisons—is used to keep celebrities in the closet and in the church. Scientology's position on homosexuality, needless to say, is controversial. Indeed the church's hard-line stance has lost them a number of prominent members in recent years.

But Scientology's position of the issue hasn't stopped Travolta from leading a rather active gay sex life, according to Randolph. Travolta, he says, visited gay spas several times a week, and was always on the lookout for some man-on-man action. And Randolph claims he's seen Travolta in any number of compromising positions over the years.

"I've seen people sucking his dick. I've seen him sucking other guys' dicks. Anal wasn't always involved. But there was always action of some kind," he says. "It was often sucking, masturbating, and jerking off in front of everyone." Not the sort of behavior, in other words, that one would be expect from a member of an anti-gay group that many call a cult.

According to Randolph, Travolta definitely has a type. "His preference is Middle Eastern or guys with dark features," he explains. "His taste has changed over the 15 years that I've seen him visiting spas. First he strictly liked black guys. For the longest time if you weren't black, he didn't want you. Then he was into Middle Eastern men. Then it was Mexicans and other Hispanic guys. Then he moved on to Koreans. I guess he doesn't have much of a preference any more."

If there's one thing he likes, though, it's guys with big dicks, Randolph claims. Especially if the men in question are straight. "He does do more masculine gay guys, but his thing is straight guys," Randolph says. "He pulls them in because they're shocked and impressed that it's Travolta and that they're hooking up with him."

How on earth does the actor seduce all these straight guys? The lure of celebrity plays a big part. "In the beginning, he would come in and people would recognize him and he would let people approach him," Randolph says of Travolta's seduction technique. "He's very personable, and he would use the fact he's a star to reel guys in." Eventually, he took that for granted. "It got to the point where he wouldn't even look at a person's eyes, he'd just stare at their cock and then follow them off to a more secluded space. That's how he operates now. For the last couple of years, he's had no discretion."

While Randolph isn't afraid to get into some of the dirty details, there are a few things he didn't want to get into, like the size of Travolta's endowment or some of the more outrageous things he's seen him do over the years. "That's in the book. But he's over-the-top kinky," Randolph says. "Dirty, dirty, kinky, kinky. Stuff no one in their right mind would want to come out."

Speaking of never coming out, it's doubtful Travolta ever will—especially considering he has a pregnant wife and is devoted to an anti-gay "religious" group. According to Randolph, though, it's hardly a secret. "Everyone in LA knows."

Obama & Rahm members of same gay bath house in Chicago . . .

By Wayne Madsen


** President Obama and his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel are lifetime members of the same gay bath house in uptown Chicago, according to informed sources in Chicago’s gay community, as well as veteran political sources in the city.

The bath house, Man’s Country, caters to older white men and it has been in business for some 30 years and is known as one of uptown Chicago’s “grand old bathhouses.” WMR was told by sources who are familiar with the bath house that it provides one-year “lifetime” memberships to paying customers and that the club’s computerized files and pre-computer paper files, include membership information for both Obama and Emanuel. The data is as anonymized as possible for confidentiality purposes. However, sources close to “Man’s Country” believe the U.S. Secret Service has purged the computer and filing cabinet files of the membership data on Obama and Emanuel.
Members of Man’s Country are also issued club identification cards. WMR learned that Obama and Emanuel possessed the ID cards, which were required for entry.
Obama began frequenting Man’s Country in the mid-1990s, during the time he transitioned from a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School to his election as an Illinois State Senator in 1996. Emanuel, reportedly joined Man’s Country after he left the Clinton White Hosue and moved back to Chicago in 1998, joining the investment firm of Wasserstein Perella and maintaining his membership during his 2002 campaign for the U.S. 5th District House seat vacated by Rod Blagojevich, who was elected governor.
Man’s Country appears to be a “one stop shopping” center for gay men. The club’s website advertises steam rooms, “fantasy rooms,” bed rooms, male strippers, adult movies, and lockers.
However, Man’s Country was not the only location for Obama’s predatory gay sex activities. The Chicago gay community is aware that Obama often made contacts with younger men at his famous “pick-up basketball” games. It was at these “pick up” matches where Obama first met Emanuel and a young Democratic campaign worker and senior bank vice president named Alexi Giannoulias. Currently running for Obama’s old U.S. Senate seat now occupied by Roland Burris, Giannoulias successfully ran for Illinois Treasurer in 2006 after being drafted for the run by Chicago’s Democratic machine.
The Blagojevich trial: “Sex, Lies, and Audio tapes” — Fitzgerald’s US Attorney’s Office part of White House cover-up of gay sex in the Second City.
Giannoulias was a vice president and senior loan officer for his father’s bank, Broadway Bank, from 2002 to 2006. Broadway Bank made real estate loans to Antoin “Tony” Rezko, the chief of Rezmar Corporation. On May 13, 2008, Rezko was found guilty, after being indicted by a grand jury at the behest of the U.S. Attorney for Northern Illinois Patrick J. Fitzgerald, of six counts of wire fraud, six counts of mail fraud, two counts of corrupt solicitation, and two counts of money laundering. Rezko has been in solitary confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center at Van Buren and Clark in Chicago since June 2008. However, Rezko has not yet been officially sentenced to a federal prison. A Syrian-American, Rezko is considered to be a flight risk, even though his one-time fortune of $50 million has been reduced to zero.
One Republican politician in Chicago told WMR that Rezko will be a prime witness for Blagojevich’s defense. “Figure it this way, Rezko’s been in solitary confinement in the city jail since June 0f 2008 . . . if he is released to appear at Blagojevich’s trial as the primary witness, everyone expects him to squeal like a pig,” said the Republican politico.
In 2005, Rezko reportedly engaged in a complicated real estate “flip” through which his wife Rita and Obama agreed to split an empty lot adjoining a home that Obama bought in Chicago’s Kenwood district. The deal saw Obama buy the home for $1.65 million, which was $300,00 below market value. Obama then bought a strip of the adjoining property from Mrs. Rezko, a speculative deal that stood to make Obama a handsome profit. Since Rezko’s conviction, the property has has reportedly gone into bankruptcy. Giannoulias’s Broadway Bank was seized by the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation on April 23, 2010, reportedly as Secretary of Treasury Tim Geithner was on his way to Chicago to present the bank with a bailout check. Geithner quickly changed his plans.
Giannoulias, Broadway’s then-senior loan officer, has denied being involved in the decision to loan money to Rezko.
Blagojevich’s trial judge, U.S. District Court judge James Zagel, a crony of former Illinois Republican Governor Jim Thompson, ruled that all 500 hours of phone calls intercepted and taped by Fitzgerald could not be played during Blagojevich’s trial as demanded by Blagojevich and his defense lawyers. Blagojevich demanded that Fitzgerald “show up in court and explain to everybody . . . why you don’t want those tapes that you made played in court.”
WMR has learned that the tapes may contain salty references Obama’s and Emanuel’s private lives.
WMR attempted to interview Blagojevich’s senior defense lawyer Sam Adam to no avail but other informed sources told us that the tapes, if played, would highlight the corruption of not only Obama, Emanuel, and other member of Obama’s Chicago “brain trust” but also Fitzgerald himself. WMR was told that Fitzgerald’s tactics have included providing sex and drugs to imprisoned felons to get them to provide perjured testimony at federal trials.
It is exactly the type of federal prosecutorial misconduct by Fitzgerald that former Republican Governor said was used by state prosecutors when he commuted the death sentences of Illinois’s death row population. Ryan was indicted by Fitzgerald for fraud and he is currently serving out a federal prison sentence.
Blagojevich’s trial was scheduled to begin on June 3 and Fitzgerald’s main interest was to keep the trial focused on Blagojevich, especially after he managed to “flip” Blagojevich’s former chief of staff John Harris to testify against the impeached and ousted governor. WMR learned from informed sources that one lawyer on Harris’s defense team is involved in a gay partner scandal that was discovered by the attorney’s wife.
Some of the wiretaps may reveal that it was not Valerie Jarrett, Obama’s longtime friend and current White House policy adviser who was Obama’s top candidate to fill his U.S. Senate seat, but the young 32-year old “pick up basketball” friend of Obama, Giannoulias, then serving his second year as state Treasurer. However, Obama had avoided campaigning for Giannoulias in Illinois and there were initial indications that the president had “thrown Giannoulias under the bus,” according to some Democratic political circles in Chicago. However, Obama has since had a change of heart and began to campaign for him.
Mutiple Chicago sources report that Republicans who see Giannoulias’s Obama connections as providing an edge in his Senate race this year should not celebrate prematurely. Giannoulias’s GOP opponent, U.S. Representative Mark Kirk, a Naval Reserve intelligence officer, has also been identified as a closeted gay man. Kirk divorced his wife last year after an eight-year marriage. They had no children.
In addition, U.S. Representative Aaron Shock, who took over the House seat vacated by Obama’s Republican Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, is, according to Chicago Boy’s Town sources, a habitué of Minibar, a noted gay bar in Chicago’s gay district. For an extremely young first term member of the House, observers were surprised when GOP Minority Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia named Shock as a Deputy Minority Whip.

Man’s Country, one of Chicago’s “grand old bathhouses” and located at 5015 North Clark Street in Chicago’s “Boystown,” was a frequent hangout for State Senator Obama and Rahm Emanuel
Sources in Chicago’s gay community report that Obama was attracted to Man’s Country’s older white clientele because he generally enjoys being fellated by older white men. Obama would regularly be seen at Man’s Country on Wednesdays.
Obama reportedly has never engaged in reciprocal activity. The sources also confirm the allegations made during the 2008 campaign by Larry Sinclair, a Chicago visitor who revealed that in 1999 he engaged in such oral sex activity and crack cocaine use with then-State senator Obama on two occasions, once in the back of a Chicago limousine operated by Five Star Limousine Service, and the other at a Chicago area motel, the Comfort Suites in Gurnee, Illinois.
After revealing details of the encounter at a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, Sinclair was arrested by Washington Metropolitan Police on a fugitive warrant issued by Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, the son of Obama’s vice presidential running mate, Senator Joe Biden. Sinclair was charged with a misdemeanor count of theft of money orders, however, the state of Delaware declined prosecution. Beau Biden later declined to run for his father’s old Senate seat because of his duties to prosecute a major pedophilia case involving Lewes, Delaware pediatrician Dr. Earl Bradley. There are reports that Biden’s office helped to cover up Bradley’s activities, including failing to authorize search warants for Bradley’s office and computer.
Chicago’s “DLC” — not the Democratic Leadership Council but the “Down Low Club” — a gay matchmaking service
WMR spoke to several well-placed sources in Chicago who reported that Jeremiah Wright, the pastor of Obama’s former church of 20 years, Trinity United Church of Christ (TUCC) on Chicago’s south side, ran what was essentially a matchmaking service for gay married black professional members of the church, including lawyers and businessmen, particularly those with children. The matchmaking club was called the “Down Low Club” but references to it over the phone and email simply referred to the group with the code phrase “DLC.” The ruse, according to our sources, was to make anyone who was eavesdropping on the communications believe that the references were to the Democratic Leadership Council, also known as the DLC.
The gay DLC’s services were intended to keep ensure TUCC’s gay members avoided posting solicitations on web services like Craig’s List and refrain from cruising gay bars. The strategy was to protect them from getting busted and being “outed.”
Among the members of the gay “DLC” were Obama and TUCC’s choir director, Donald Young, an openly gay man who reportedly had a sexual relationship with Obama. Two other gay members of the church were Larry Bland and Nate Spencer. Young and Bland were brutally murdered, execution style, in late 2007. Bland was murdered on November 17, 2007 and Young on December 24, 2007. The latter was killed by multiple gunshot wounds. Spencer reportedly died on December 26, 2007, official cause of death: “septicemia, pneumonia, and HIV.”
“DLC” members often went on camping trips arranged by TUCC. Wright reportedly was the head of the “DLC” matchmaking services and ensured that its members protected each other.
The “DLC’s” clientele included Obama and other gay members of TUCC, including, reportedly Young, Bland, and Spencer. Fox 32 Chicago reported that Bland’s mother, Josephine Bland, was so upset at her son inviting men into their home as a result of contacting them through gay web sites like “Adam4Adam,” she moved out.
The gay community in Chicago knows to keep away from the TUCC and “DLC” stories because of the “creepiness” of the operation and the suspicious deaths of the three TUCC gay black men.
Obama protected his alternate life style through the secretiveness of the “DLC,” he was not so careful when he proclaimed he was a state senator while frolicking at Man’s Country in uptown Chicago.

*Love: Obama’s personal trainer
Reggie Love, a former Duke basketball and football player and unsuccessful National Basketball hopeful, currently serves as Obama’s personal trainer and White House “special assistant” — he has been called Obama’s “body man” – who receives a salary of $104,000 a year. Love is also reportedly one of Obama’s regular gay sex partners. Love joined Obama’s Senate staff in a senior staff position in 2006.
Media General’s tabloid, the National Enquirer, proffered a story last year about Michelle Obama being furious about the relationship between her husband and his “body man.” The Enquirer’s sister tabloid, The Globe, later floated a story about Obama having a relationship with a Democratic campaign official named Vera Baker. WMR has been told that this relationship was a clever ruse to throw off speculation about Obama’s actual past sex partners. Baker has apparently left the United States for relatively more obscurity in Martinique. Media General’s tabloids have scooped the mainstream media on sex scandals involving Bill Clinton and Gennifer Flowers and Monica Lewinsky, Tiger Woods, and John Edwards and Rielle Hunter.
WMR’s Chicago sources believe the Secret Service records of presidential candidate Obama’s activities in Chicago would show that Obama regularly arrived at Love’s Chicago residence at 9:00 am and departed at 9:15 am. Sources told WMR that while 15 minutes is much too short for a personal training exercise, it is ample time for fellatio.
Bill Frist, “Brokeback Mountain,” and Obama
In 2006, after Obama became the junior senator from Illinois, WMR’s sources in the Congressional Black Caucus reported that there were persistent rumors of gay trysts between Obama and then-GOP Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee. The allegations at the time seemed unbelievable.
However, based on Obama’s penchant for receiving fellatio from older white men, a column written by The Washington Post’s “In the Loop” columnist Al Kamen on April 7, 2006, some four months into Obama’s Senate term, may have expanded relevance. Kamen reported he received an invitation to attend Frist’s “5th Annual VOLPAC ’06 Weekend” in Nashville from April 21st to 23rd and that the invitation card required one to “unbuckle the cowboy’s pants and look inside to see what this was all about.” Kamen opined that the invitation seemed “a bit too ‘Brokeback Mountain.’”
The invitation advertised that the shindig would feature “one-of-a-kind music and special friends,” although Kamen said there was no indication what made the “friends” so “special.” Kamen then wrote, “The back of the card shows the cowboy from behind with a red flowered handkerchief sticking out of his right pocket. Wait a minute — wasn’t there something about how this used to be some kind of code in the gay community years ago? A way to signal each other in crowded, noisy bars? So we checked the GayCityUSA.com’s Hanky Codes. Sure enough, there it was in the chart explaining what they mean: red hanky in right pocket. Oh, dear.”

Rumors about Obama and Frist ran amok in Congressional Black Caucus circles in 2006.
Although Frist ran on the pledge of only serving two terms, he became Senate Majority Leader with all the perks of the office. WMR’s sources in Chicago’s gay community revealed that Frist’s Majority Leader predecessor, Senator Trent Lott of Mississippi, was also known to seek the services of male prostitutes. Frist, who said he planned to run for President in 2006, decided against a run for the White House and also declined a run for Tennessee governor in 2010.
With the rumor mill running at full speed in 2006, it is obvious why Frist abandoned politics so quickly for the medical business. Frist later endorsed Obama’s health care proposals. A year later, when GOP Senator Larry Craig was arrested while soliciting for sex in a men’s toilet stall at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, he changed his mind about immediately resigning his Senate seat. Knowing about his colleagues’ behavior, he dug in his heels and completed his term in January 2009.

*Rahm the “Sugar Daddy”
Obama’s chief of staff Emanuel, who won a scholarship to the Joffrey Ballet but turned it down to attend college, is married and, like Obama, has children, in Emanuel’s case, a son and two daughters.
However, Emanuel, who is 50, also travel frequently with a male companion, a wealthy Chicago real estate developer, some five to six years his senior. WMR has learned from Chicago’s gay community as well as political sources that Emanuel and his friend have gone together on a trip to India, skiing vacations, and soon plan a vacation in Florida, sans Mrs. Emanuel and the kids.
In Chicago’s gay community, Emanuel is known as “sugar daddy,” promising young men with perks and lucrative positions if they sleep with him. On occasion, Emanuel has been with older men, such as his travel companion, but his preference is young, according to WMR’s sources. Emanuel also often uses bicycling and basketball venues to make his approaches. Being an Emanuel “basketball buddy” is a key to professional success.
WMR spoke to one member of the gay community in Chicago who had first hand knowledge of one of Emanuel’s bed partners, an older man who runs a non-profit symphony organization.

*Obama’s other sex partners
WMR has previously reported on Obama’s past trysts with Alabama Democratic U.S. Representative Artur Davis, a current primary candidate for governor of Alabama. Although not in the same class, Obama and Davis attended Harvard Law School during an overlap of their attendance at the law school.
The information on Davis and Obama was gathered by opposition researchers for former Alabama Representative Earl Hilliard, who Davis defeated in the 2002 Democratic primary. Recently, WMR was informed by sources in Alabama that Attorney General Eric Holder traveled three days ago to Alabama to inform Davis that if he loses his primary race, he would be nominated by Obama to fill the job of U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, a position still held by Bush-appointee Leura Canary, one of the main prosecutors of convicted and jailed former Alabama Democratic Governor Don Siegelman.
Chicago sources also informed WMR of another past gay partner of Obama, Massachusetts Democratic Governor Deval Patrick.

* Men who have reportedly had sexual relations with Barack Obama *

Donald Young, TUCC Choir director
Larry Sinclair, gay escort
Reggie Love, White House presidential assistant and Obama’s “body man”
Artur Davis, US Representative from Alabama and gubernatorial candidate
Bill Frist, former GOP Senate Majority Leader
Deval Patrick, Governor of Massachusetts

*The Clear and Present Blackmail Threat
Leading secret alternate life styles, Obama and his chief of staff provide classic blackmail threats. Considering Obama’s choice for the Supreme Court, Elena Kagan, who is reputedly a semi-open lesbian, the question must be posed how much Obama’s and Emanuel’s own covert life styles led to the decision to nominate Kagan, someone with no experience on a judicial bench.
Similarly, the fact that so much is known about Obama’s and Emanuel’s trysts in Chicago begs another important question. If politicians, gay community activists, and journalists in the Windy City are aware of Obama’s and Emanuel’s highly blackmailable gay life styles, the same can certainly hold true for the executives of one of Chicago’s corporate headquarters — that of BP America’s Production Operations.
Throw in the intelligence agencies of America’s allies, friends, enemies, and the situation becomes a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States.
Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist, author and syndicated columnist. He has written for several renowned papers and blogs.
Madsen is a regular contributor on Russia Today. He has been a frequent political and national security commentator on Fox News and has also appeared on ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN, BBC, Al Jazeera, and MS-NBC. Madsen has taken on Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity on their television shows. He has been invited to testifty as a witness before the US House of Representatives, the UN Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and an terrorism investigation panel of the French government.
As a U.S. Naval Officer, he managed one of the first computer security programs for the U.S. Navy. He subsequently worked for the National Security Agency, the Naval Data Automation Command, Department of State, RCA Corporation, and Computer Sciences Corporation.

Madsen is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ), Association for Intelligence Officers (AFIO), and the National Press Club.

* PROCESSED MEATS DECLARED TOO DANGEROUS FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION *

* The World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) has just completed a detailed review of more than 7,000 clinical studies covering links between diet and cancer. Its conclusion is rocking the health world with startling bluntness: Processed meats are too dangerous for human consumption. Consumers should stop buying and eating all processed meat products for the rest of their lives.

Processed meats include bacon, sausage, hot dogs, sandwich meat, packaged ham, pepperoni, salami and virtually all red meat used in frozen prepared meals. They are usually manufactured with a carcinogenic ingredient known as sodium nitrite. This is used as a color fixer by meat companies to turn packaged meats a bright red color so they look fresh. Unfortunately, sodium nitrite also results in the formation of cancer-causing nitrosamines in the human body. And this leads to a sharp increase in cancer risk for those who eat them.

A 2005 University of Hawaii study found that processed meats increase the risk of pancreatic cancer by 67 percent. Another study revealed that every 50 grams of processed meat consumed daily increases the risk of colorectal cancer by 50 percent. These are alarming numbers. Note that these cancer risks do not come from eating fresh, non-processed meats. They only appear in people who regularly consume processed meat products containing sodium nitrite.

Sodium nitrite appears predominantly in red meat products (you won’t find it in chicken or fish products). Here’s a short list of food items to check carefully for sodium nitrite and monosodium glutamate (MSG), another dangerous additive:

* Beef jerky
* Bacon
* Sausage
* Hot dogs
* Sandwich meat
* Frozen pizza with meat
* Canned soups with meat
* Frozen meals with meat
* Ravioli and meat pasta foods
* Kid’s meals containing red meat
* Sandwich meat used at popular restaurants

Nearly all red meats sold at public schools, restaurants, hospitals, hotels and theme parks
If sodium nitrite is so dangerous to humans, why do the FDA and USDA continue to allow this cancer-causing chemical to be used? The answer, of course, is that food industry interests now dominate the actions by U.S. government regulators. The USDA, for example, tried to ban sodium nitrite in the late 1970’s but was overridden by the meat industry. It insisted the chemical was safe and accused the USDA of trying to “ban bacon.” Today, the corporations that dominate American food and agricultural interests hold tremendous influence over the FDA and USDA. Consumers are offered no real protection from dangerous chemicals intentionally added to foods, medicines and personal care products.

You can protect yourself and your family from the dangers of processed meats by following a few simple rules:

* Always read ingredient labels.
* Don’t buy anything made with sodium nitrite or monosodium glutamate.
* Don’t eat red meats served by restaurants, schools, hospitals, hotels or other institutions.

And finally, eat more fresh produce with every meal. There is evidence that natural vitamin C found in citrus fruits and exotic berries (like camu camu) helps prevent the formation of cancer-causing nitrosamines, protecting you from the devastating health effects of sodium nitrite in processed meats. The best defense, of course, is to avoid eating processed meats altogether.

ROUGE U.S. SOLDIERS IN AFGHANISTAN ACCUSED OF KILLING AFGHAN CIVILIANS FOR SPORT . . . *

By Craig Whitlock
Saturday, September 18, 2010; 9:39 PM
AT JOINT BASE LEWIS-MCCHORD, WASH. The U.S. soldiers hatched a plan as simple as it was savage: to randomly target and kill an Afghan civilian, and to get away with it . . .

* For weeks, according to Army charging documents, rogue members of a platoon from the 5th Stryker Combat Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, floated the idea. Then, one day last winter, a solitary Afghan man approached them in the village of La Mohammed Kalay. The "kill team" activated the plan.

One soldier created a ruse that they were under attack, tossing a fragmentary grenade on the ground. Then others opened fire.

According to charging documents, the unprovoked, fatal attack on Jan. 15 was the start of a months-long shooting spree against Afghan civilians that resulted in some of the grisliest allegations against American soldiers since the U.S. invasion in 2001. Members of the platoon have been charged with dismembering and photographing corpses, as well as hoarding a skull and other human bones.

The subsequent investigation has raised accusations about whether the military ignored warnings that the out-of-control soldiers were committing atrocities. The father of one soldier said he repeatedly tried to alert the Army after his son told him about the first killing, only to be rebuffed.

Two more slayings would follow. Military documents allege that five members of the unit staged a total of three murders in Kandahar province between January and May. Seven other soldiers have been charged with crimes related to the case, including hashish use, attempts to impede the investigation and a retaliatory gang assault on a private who blew the whistle.

Army officials have not disclosed a motive for the killings and macabre behavior. Nor have they explained how the attacks could have persisted without attracting scrutiny. They declined to comment on the case beyond the charges that have been filed, citing the ongoing investigation.

But a review of military court documents and interviews with people familiar with the investigation suggest the killings were committed essentially for sport by soldiers who had a fondness for hashish and alcohol.

The accused soldiers, through attorneys and family members, deny wrongdoing. But the case has already been marked by a cycle of accusations and counter-accusations among the defendants as they seek to pin the blame on each other, according to documents and interviews.

The Army has scheduled pre-trial hearings in the case this fall at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, home of the Stryker brigade. (The unit was renamed the 2nd Stryker Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, when it returned from Afghanistan in July.) Military officials say privately that they worry the hearings will draw further attention to the case, with photos and other evidence prompting anger among the Afghan civilians whose support is critical to the fight against the Taliban.

* The 'kill team' *

According to statements given to investigators, members of the unit - 3rd Platoon, Bravo Company, 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry Regiment - began talking about forming a "kill team" in December, shortly after the arrival of a new member, Staff Sgt. Calvin R. Gibbs, 25, of Billings, Mont.

Gibbs, whom some defendants have described as the ringleader, confided to his new mates that it had been easy for him to get away with "stuff" when he served in Iraq in 2004, according to the statements. It was his second tour in Afghanistan, having served there from January 2006 until May 2007.

The first opportunity presented itself Jan. 15 in the Maiwand district of Kandahar province. Members of the 3rd Platoon were providing perimeter security for a meeting between Army officers and tribal elders in the village of La Mohammed Kalay.

According to charging documents, an Afghan named Gul Mudin began walking toward the soldiers. As he approached, Cpl. Jeremy N. Morlock, 22, of Wasilla, Alaska, threw the grenade on the ground, records show, to create the illusion that the soldiers were under attack.

Pfc. Andrew H. Holmes, a 19-year-old from Boise, Idaho, saw the grenade and fired his weapon at Mudin, according to charging documents. The grenade exploded, prompting other soldiers to open fire on the villager as well, killing him.

In statements to investigators, the soldiers involved have given conflicting details. In one statement that his attorney has subsequently tried to suppress, Morlock said that Gibbs had given him the grenade and that others were also aware of the ruse beforehand. But Holmes and his attorney said he was in the dark and opened fire only because Morlock ordered him to do so.

"He was unwittingly used as the cover story," said Daniel Conway, a civilian defense attorney for Holmes. "He was in the wrong place at the wrong time."

Morlock, Holmes and Gibbs have each been charged with murder in the shooting. Attorneys for Morlock and Gibbs did not return phone calls seeking comment.

* A father's warning *

On Feb. 14, Christopher Winfield, a former Marine from Cape Coral, Fla., logged onto his Facebook account to chat with his son, Adam, a 3rd Platoon soldier who was up late in Afghanistan. Spec. Adam C. Winfield confided that he'd had a run-in with Gibbs, his squad leader. He also typed a mysterious note saying that some people get away with murder.

When his father pressed him to explain, Adam replied, "did you not understand what i just told you." He then referred to the slaying of the Afghan villager the month before, adding that other platoon members had threatened him because he did not approve. In addition, he said, they were bragging about how they wanted to find another victim.

"I was just shocked," Christopher Winfield said in a phone interview. "He was scared for his life at that point."

The father told his son that he would contact the Army to intervene and investigate. It was a Sunday, but he didn't wait. He called the Army inspector general's 24-hour hotline and left a voice mail. He called the office of Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), and left another message. He called a sergeant at Lewis-McChord who told him to call the Army's criminal investigations division. He left another message there.

Finally, he said, he called the Fort Lewis command center and spoke for 12 minutes to a sergeant on duty. He said the sergeant agreed that it sounded as if Adam was in potential danger but that, unless he was willing to report it to his superiors in Afghanistan, there was little the Army could do.

"He just kind of blew it off," Christopher Winfield said. "I was sitting there with my jaw on the ground."
Winfield said he doesn't recall the name of the sergeant he spoke with. Billing records that he kept confirm that he called Army officials; he also kept copies of transcripts of Facebook chats with this son. He said he specifically told the sergeant of his son's warning that more murders were in the works.

Army investigators have since taken a sworn statement from Christopher Winfield, as well as copies of his phone and Internet records.

* Other killings *

Eight days after Winfield tried to warn the Army, according to charging documents, members of the 3rd Platoon murdered someone else.

On Feb. 22, Marach Agha, an Afghan civilian, was killed by rifle fire near Forward Operating Base Ramrod in Kandahar province, where the 3rd Platoon was stationed. The Army has released few details about the slaying but has charged Gibbs, Morlock and Spec. Michael S. Wagnon II of Las Vegas with murder.

Wagnon has also been charged with possessing "a skull taken from an Afghan person's corpse." He allegedly took the head sometime during January or February 2010, but court documents do not specify whether it belonged to the Afghan he is charged with killing.

An attorney for Wagnon, who was on his second tour in Afghanistan and also served in Iraq, did not return a call seeking comment.

More mayhem followed in March, when Gibbs, Wagnon and three other soldiers - Staff Sgt. Robert G. Stevens, Sgt. Darren N. Jones and Pfc. Ashton A. Moore - opened fire on three Afghan men, according to charging documents. The documents do not provide basic details, such as the precise date of the shooting, the identities of the victims or whether they were wounded.

Members of the 3rd Platoon found their next victim on May 2, documents show. Gibbs, Morlock and Adam Winfield - the son of the former Marine who said he tried to alert the Army three months earlier - are accused of tossing a grenade and fatally shooting an Afghan cleric, Mullah Adahdad, near Forward Operating Base Ramrod.

Winfield's attorney, Eric S. Montalvo, said his client was ordered to shoot but fired high and missed. He and Winfield's parents say they can't understand why the Army has charged their son, given that his father tried to warn officials about the platoon.

Military police caught wind of the final killing a few days later, but only by happenstance. Records show they were coincidentally investigating reports of hashish use by members of the 3rd Platoon.

After word leaked that one soldier had spoken to military police, several platoon members retaliated, records show. They confronted the informant and beat him severely - punching, kicking and choking the soldier, then dragging him across the ground. As a last warning, the documents state, Gibbs menacingly waved finger bones he had collected from Afghan corpses.

However, the informant talked to the MPs again and told them what he had heard about the slayings, according to court documents.

Some members of his unit, he said in a statement, "when they are out at a village, wander off and kill someone and every time they say the same thing, about a guy throwing a grenade, but there is never proof."

This time, the Army acted quickly and made arrests.

Most Western Women In Death Spiral - Morals Gone . . .

"We must introduce into their education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their order."
Protocols of Zion, 16

"Leaving a long-term relationship and reentering the brave new world of dating was a culture shock....Many of these young women substitute an engagement ring with a noose."

by Stewart Overton
(Stewart is a 31-yr-old man living in Florida.)

* It all started on a cool January day in 1995. I went to the mall with a friend of mine to "Mac" or in other words to court any random young lady that I might find. Well, that day I lucked out and found a beautiful young girl that I would shortly begin to date. I was fifteen years old. Unbelievably, we braved the storm of youth together and it lasted eleven years. We never married or had children. Instead she went to college and I began a promising career. What was the cause of our eventual demise?

She obtained a bachelors degree in Biology and was an excellent pupil of the liberal establishment. She was highly competitive with me and was overtly against having a child. I demanded we seek counseling and she demanded that I go first; so I left, for good.

My woman was highly intelligent, fiercely argumentative, and had absolutely no sympathy for the anguish my young and idealistic mind was suffering, post 9-11 studying the manipulation and mechanics of an evil global elite. (She referred to my rants as psycho babble)

The break-up was devastating. Our friends cried for us. What a beautiful wedding it would have been. Afterward, I connected with the comrades of my youth. I assuaged my pain by embracing the social scene and all of it's debauchery and decadence. We caroused the bars and strip clubs, drinking, smoking, and looking for women in an apparent quest to debase ourselves.

RETURN TO THE "DATING" SCENE

I am politically conservative and a free thinker, because I obtained my high school diploma and didn't go to university. This spared me the scorched earth liberal indoctrination agenda. Secondly, I WAS in a long term relationship and didn't spend every waking moment chasing sex spiked with promiscuity. I was allowed to focus on higher things instead.

Leaving this long-term relationship and reentering the brave new world of dating was a culture shock.

I met a girl from a social website at the time too. She was 23 and asked me to join her for our first encounter on a Friday night around midnight at a gas station. She jumped in my car and we drove down the street to her home and It took all of five minutes for her to sit on my lap and begin kissing me. She asked me to come inside to have sex with her but I bit my knuckle and told her I would pick her up the next day so we could get to know each other a bit. I will leave the rest to your imagination. It is worth noting that she admitted to me she was a nymphomaniac and bi-sexual. Our courtship dance lasted about three days.

As a matter of fact, the six women I was with after the break up including the one I am with now, are self proclaimed bi-sexuals.

The next girl I encountered was frightening. She was 18 years old and I met her at a Gothic club. My pick up line was an insult. I managed to get her phone number and within the week, seduced her with sexual text messages and she drove to my neighborhood to see me. She had lots of tattoo's and piercings everywhere imaginable, including the six in her tongue. She was the most backward girl I have ever met.

She revealed to me plans for her suicide in the coming months. She was a sexual deviant; threesomes and S&M were commonplace in her life. I couldn't stay with her for many reasons but I learned something important.

Many of these young women substitute an engagement ring with a rope . Several of the girls I was with wanted me to choke them or tie them up and they would scratch and bite me till I bled during sex.

They needed to be physically assaulted in order to reach an orgasm and ensure they were far away from making love.

It's almost as if I was experiencing a perverted form of marriage. If they could seduce me to enter their world of sex and violence, I would become another casualty of having to engage in reckless behavior just to ejaculate and therefore, be trapped with a certain caliber of woman. I ran like Hell.

This particular example is an extreme situation, true, but I found it to be relative with most young women, even "normal" ones.

Bottom line, It was easy to get laid but the idea of commitment and family were laughable. The moral of the story is, morals have gone down the tube. The struggles that younger men and women face in America are collateral damage in a war zone as expansive as the western world itself.

I'm in a three year relationship now with a woman who was very liberal but has come around a lot to the idea that getting married, having a baby, and traditional male female roles might actually make us happy.

The problem is, I don't know if we can recover from the damage social engineering has inflicted upon us . The sex has all but disappeared. We both just look at smut instead, afraid of pregnancy. We're engaged but there is no wedding date in sight; It's falling apart because of our fear to move forward.

I feel like I have been brutalized by the media promotion of instant sex with all and sundry. I have pity for the generations to come, for I fear they will be twice as warped as me. We are being systematically and structurally re defined. I do not see any hope beside a barrage of solar flares setting us back a thousand years, or some of your articles becoming required reading. :)

AIDS a man-made disease - contniued

* The Manmade Origin Of AIDS *
Paris and Dr. Kwame Nantambu, September 27, 2002

* Yes, you read it correctly. AIDS is manmade. Here you will read, explicitly,
that the US government funded the creation of this virus that would ?lead to
yet another method of massive killing of large populations? and ?be
refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we
depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.? Yes, there
is most definitely a war going on, and it is much scarier than you probably
ever imagined. Read on:

The Development of the AIDS virus was funded in 1969 through funds obtained
by the United States Defense Department via House Bill 15090. The Bill,
which called for the US Defense Department to receive $10 million dollars to
research, test and develop the virus, was reviewed in Hearings before the
Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives
during the ninety-first Congress in review of the Defense Appropriations for
1970. Copies of the full text of the Bill are not available in any public
library and are impossible to locate online, although many other Bills are.

Part Five of H.R. 15090 was entitled RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND
EVALUATION, sponsored by the Department of the Army, the Advanced Research
Project Agency (now DARPA), and Defense Research and Engineering.

The Feasibility program and laboratories were to have been completed by 1974
- 1975 and the virus between 1974 - 1979. The World Health Organization
(WHO) started to inject AIDS - laced smallpox vaccine (Vaccina) into
Africans in 1977. Over 2000 young white male homosexuals were injected with
laced Hepatitis B vaccine in 1978 through the Centers for Disease Control
and the New York Blood Center. The development of the virus apparently had a
dual purpose: (1) As a political/ethnic weapon to be used against black
individuals and (2) one of the programmed efforts at de-population.

For the record it must be stated emphatically that the origin of AIDS has
absolutely nothing to do with the green monkey, African people nor the
Haitians.

The stark reality is that, according to The Strecker Memorandum (1983):

-AIDS is a man-made disease

-AIDS is not a homosexual disease

-AIDS is not a venereal disease

-AIDS can be carried by mosquitoes

-There are at least six different AIDS viruses in the world 1

AIDS represents the most potent medical weapon in the armory of Europeans to
annihilate, decimate and castrate African, Hispanic and Asian peoples under
the rubric of European supremacy.

Why and How was AIDS Created?

The AIDS virus was created 'as a political/ethnic weapon to be used mainly
against Blacks.2 ?AIDS is biological warfare at its Euro-supremacist
zenith,? according to Malcolm Turner in his book AIDS is Biological Warfare:
A Warning to African People. ?AIDS is not an act of God against homosexuals;
it did not appear out of thin air and it did not come from Africa. It was
designed to kill people of color and a review of the statistics show that
this is exactly what is happening...it is the creation of a sick, demented
white racist power structure...?3

?The creation and subsequent deployment of the AIDS virus by the World
Health Organization was not just a diabolical scientific exercise that got
out of hand. It was a cold-blood successful attempt to create a killer virus
which was then used in a successful experiment in Africa?.4

The creation of AIDS ?was not an accident?. It was deliberate.5 AIDS is
nothing less than genocide by white racists against the rest of humanity.6

The Real Origin of AIDS

The AIDS virus was created by the United States government at Fort Dietrich
in Maryland, a biological warfare laboratory in building number A550 in the
P4 lab. The sum of US $10m was requested by the Defense Department to build
the lab under the House of Representatives Bill number H.R. 15090 in the
91st Congress in 1970.7

Dr. Theodore Strecker writes, ?The US National Cancer institute, in
collaboration with the World Health Organization, manufactured the AIDS
virus in their laboratories at Fort Detrich, Maryland. They combined two
deadly retroviruses, the Bovine Leukemia Virus and the Visna Virus, and
injected them into human tissue cultures. The result was the AIDS virus, the
first human retrovirus known to man and now believed to be 100 percent fatal
to those infected?.8

Dr. Strecker further contends that AIDS couldn't have engineered itself, and
reiterates that it was produced in a laboratory by virologists. ?The World
Health Organization (WHO) called for scientists to work with these deadly
agents and attempt to make a hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans. An
attempt was made to see if viruses could in fact exert selective effects on
immune function. The possibility was looked into that the immune response to
the virus itself would be impaired if the infecting virus damaged, more or
less selectively, the cell responding to the virus?.9

The AIDS epidemic was triggered by the mass vaccination campaign which
eradicated smallpox.10 In fact, the WHO itself has studied ?new scientific
evidence suggesting that immunization with the smallpox vaccine Vaccinia,
awakened the unsuspected, dormant human immuno defense virus infection
(HIV)?.11

Pearce Wright, an advisor to the WHO, writes, ?I thought it was just a
coincidence until we studied the latest findings about the reactions which
can be caused by Vaccinia. Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the
explanation to the explosion of AIDS?.12

The fact of the matter is that the WHO concluded that ?in the relation to
the immune response, a number of useful experimental approaches can be
visualized?.13 As a result, ?they suggested that a way to do this would be
to put their new killer virus (AIDS) into a vaccination program, sit back
and observe the results?.14

The WHO used smallpox vaccine as their vicious vehicle to spread the AIDS
virus and the geographic areas chosen were Uganda and other African
countries, Haiti, Brazil and Japan. The present ?AIDS epidemic coincides
with these geographical areas?.15

As an addendum, ?there is also substantial evidence? to show that a
confidential source in the WHO has revealed that there is ?a strong
correlation between the proportion of people in different central African
countries who consented to the smallpox vaccine program and the proportion
of those now infected with AIDS?.16

The stark reality is that ?the AIDS virus must be a man-made, bio-engineered
virus?.17

Hence, it?s no great surprise that the WHO, in true Euro-supremacist modus
operandi, ?started to inject AIDS-laced smallpox vaccine (Vaccina) into over
100 million Africans (as part of its global non-European population
reduction program) in 1977?.18

Dr. Theodore A. Strecker further writes, "If the African green monkey could
transmit AIDS to humans, the present known amount of infection in Africa
makes it statistically impossible for a single episode, such as a monkey
biting someone, to have brought this epidemic to this point. The doubling
time of the number of people infected, about every 14 months, when
correlated with the first known case, and the present known number of cases,
prove beyond a doubt that a large number of people had to have been infected
at the same time. Starting in 1972 with the first case from our mythical
monkey and doubling the number infected from that single source every 14
months you get only a few thousand cases. From 1972 to 1987 is 15 years or
180 months. If it takes 14 months to double the number of cases, then there
would have been 13 doublings, 1 then 2, then 4, then 8, etc. In 15 years,
from a single source of infection there would be about 8,000 cases in
Africa, not 75 million AIDS infected people. We are approaching World War II
mortality statistics here without a shot being fired?.19

The fact of the matter is that under the current European global policy of
annihilating people of color, ?AIDS is expected to kill more people and
orphan more children than all the wars of the 20th century combined?.20

The Global Impact of AIDS

The spread of the AIDS virus is omnipresent among African peoples and people
of color. AIDS is without any doubt, the largest epidemic in human history.
The global magnitude of the impact of AIDS is such that as of June 2001,
?more than 70 percent of the people with the virus that causes AIDS are in
sub-Saharan Africa, the poorest region in the world?.21 AIDS has transformed
Africa into a ?killing field?.22

In fifteen years, ?AIDS has killed 11 million Africans, more than 80 percent
of the world's AIDS deaths?.23 AIDS ?has struck some 36 million people, 25.3
million of them in Africa, and orphaned 13 million children?.24

According to the United Nations in 1998, there are 5,500 AIDS-related
funerals every day in Africa.25 In Zimbabwe alone, 1,200 die each week from
AIDS. As of February 2001, there are 5.8 million AIDS cases in
South/Southeast Asia, 1.4 million in Latin America, and 640,000 in East
Asia. In fact, in June 1991, it was reported that ?by the end of this
decade, Asia will be the epicenter of the worldwide AIDS epidemic, host to
the fastest-growing AIDS population in the world?.26

As of February 2000, the Caribbean has as high as 700,000 people infected
with AIDS, thus making the region ?the second largest incidence in the world
after Africa?.27 In the case of the United States, African-Americans account
for about 11 percent of the national population but 57 percent of the AIDS
cases. In 1999, African-Americans and Hispanics accounted for almost 70
percent of new HIV infections.

However, strangely enough, death rates in Europe of people infected with the
virus that causes AIDS have fallen 84 percent since 1985.28

The reality is that two-thirds of the people in the world infected with AIDS
today are in sub-Saharan Africa, but only about 2 percent are in Western
Europe. That is no accident. It is genocide. The sole purpose of this
heinous man-made virus is to reduce the global population of African peoples
and people of color through AIDS decimation, annihilation and castration, by
any and all means necessary. AIDS represents a medical intifadah declared
against African people and people of color.

The Tuskegee Experiment

A relevant comparison analysis is the Tuskegee Experiment that was conducted
by the U.S. government on innocent and unsuspecting African-American males
from 1932-1972.

In 1932, the United States Public Health Services solicited and recruited
about 400 African-American males as guinea pigs in ?one of the most
notorious medical experiments ever? on the study of the effects of syphilis
in Macon County, Alabama.29

These subjects never gave informed consent for their participation in the
study. ?The Black men were never told they had syphilis nor were they told
their disease could endanger their families?.30 In the fall of 1932,
handbills were posted and circulated at several church gatherings in the
poor county, where even the one black doctor served only those who could
afford to pay. The ads promised "special treatment" for men with "bad
blood," which, to local folks, could mean anything from VD to anemia to
indigestion. Eager to take advantage of any kind of medical care that was
free, men signed up in droves. Sadly, even when a penicillin treatment cure
for syphilis became available in the 1940s, the men in the Tuskegee syphilis
experiment ?were not allowed to receive the antibiotic?.31

By U.S. government decree ?other doctors in Macon County were forbidden to
treat any of the men in the study?.32 These Black men were sharecroppers
with no formal education. ?Many had never seen a doctor, much less been
treated by one. Anything white people asked them to do, they did?.33

The U.S. has stated that ?the purpose of the study was to record the
destructive effects of untreated syphilis and to follow closely the medical
progress of the group until each man died?.34 However, according to Martin
P. Levine, the experiment was easily justified by physicians and scientists
because ?it was widely believed that Black racial inferiority made them a
notoriously syphilis-soaked race?.35

These physicians and scientists were convinced that: ?(The) smaller brains
(of these Black men) lacked mechanisms for controlling sexual desire,
causing them to be highly promiscuous. They matured early and consequently
were more sexually active, and the Black man's enormous penis with its long
foreskin was prone to venereal infections. These physiological differences
meant that disease must affect the races differently?.36

Conclusion

In sum, the U.S. government-sponsored Tuskegee Experiment is germ-biological
warfare committed on its own citizens for 40 years. It must be noted,
however, that in 1974, a US Civil Rights attorney won a $10m settlement from
the government for the Tuskegee victims and their heirs, and another $2.1m
payment was received in 1976. On May 16, 1997, then-President Bill Clinton
issued an official public apology on behalf of the U.S. government to the
victims of the Tuskegee experiment.37

So you see, the notion of waging biological warfare on so-called undesirable
populations is not a foreign one to the US Government. This is it?s legacy -
the greatest homicidal and genocidal killing machine in the history of
civilization.

HIV and AIDS: Are You at Risk?

What is HIV and how can I get it?

HIV - the human immunodeficiency virus - is a virus that kills your body?s
"CD4 cells." CD4 cells (also called T-helper cells) help your body fight off
infection and disease. HIV can be passed from person to person if someone
with HIV infection has sex with or shares drug injection needles with
another person. It also can be passed from a mother to her baby when she is
pregnant, when she delivers the baby, or if she breast-feeds her baby.

What is AIDS?

AIDS - the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome - is a disease you get when
HIV destroys your body?s immune system. Normally, your immune system helps
you fight off illness. When your immune system fails you can become very
sick and can die.

What do I need to know about HIV?

The first cases of AIDS were identified in the United States in 1981, but
AIDS most likely existed here and in other parts of the world for many years
before that time. In 1984 scientists proved that HIV causes AIDS.

Anyone can get HIV. The most important thing to know is how you can get the
virus.

can get HIV:

- By having unprotected sex- sex without a condom- with someone who has HIV.
The virus can be in an infected person?s blood, semen, or vaginal secretions
and can enter your body through tiny cuts or sores in your skin, or in the
lining of your vagina, penis, rectum, or mouth.

- By sharing a needle and syringe to inject drugs or sharing drug equipment
used to prepare drugs for injection with someone who has HIV.

From a blood transfusion or blood clotting factor that you got before
1985. (But today it is unlikely you could get infected that way because all
blood in the United States has been tested for HIV since 1985.)

- Babies born to women with HIV also can become infected during pregnancy,
birth, or breast-feeding.

You cannot get HIV:

- By working with or being around someone who has HIV.

- From sweat, clothes, drinking fountains, phones, toilet seats, or through
everyday things like sharing a meal.

- From donating blood.

- From a closed-mouth kiss (but there is a chance of getting it from
open-mouthed or "French" kissing with an infected person because of possible
blood contact).

How can I protect myself?

- Don?t share needles and syringes used to inject drugs, steroids, vitamins,
or for tattooing or body piercing. Also, don?t share equipment ("works")
used to prepare drugs to be injected. Many people have been infected with
HIV, hepatitis, and other germs this way. Germs from an infected person can
stay in a needle and then be injected directly into the next person who uses
the needle.

- Don?t have sex. Or, if you do make this decision, have sex only with one
partner who you know doesn?t have HIV and is only having sex with you. The
more sex partners you have, the greater your chances are of getting HIV or
other diseases passed through sex.

- Use a latex condom every time you have sex, including oral and anal sex.
If you are allergic to latex, there is a polyurethane (a type of plastic)
condom that you can try. There also is a condom that women can use to
protect themselves. Don?t use lambskin condoms - they might not protect you
against HIV.

- Don?t share razors or toothbrushes because of the possibility of contact
with blood. If you are pregnant or think you might be soon, talk to a doctor
or your local health department about being tested for HIV. Drug treatments
are available to help you and reduce the chance of passing HIV to your baby
if you have it.

How do I know if I have HIV or AIDS?

You might have HIV and still feel perfectly healthy. The only way to know
for sure if you are infected or not is to be tested. Talk with a
knowledgeable health care provider or counselor both before and after you
are tested. You can go to your doctor or health department for testing or
buy a home collection kit (for testing for HIV antibodies) at many
pharmacies. To find out where to go in your area for HIV counseling and
testing, call your local health department or the CDC National AIDS Hotline,
at 1-800-342-AIDS (2437).

Your doctor or health care provider can give you a confidential HIV test.
The information on your HIV test and test results are confidential, just as
your other medical information. This means it can be shared only with people
authorized to see your medical records. You can ask your doctor, health care
provider, or HIV counselor at the place you are tested to explain who can
obtain this information. For example, you may want to ask whether your
insurance company could find out your HIV status if you make a claim for
health insurance benefits or apply for life insurance or disability
insurance.

In many states, you can be tested anonymously. These tests are usually given
at special places known as anonymous testing sites. When you get an
anonymous HIV test, the testing site records only a number or code with the
test result, not your name. A counselor gives you this number at the time
your blood, saliva, or urine is taken for the test, then you return to the
testing site (or perhaps call the testing site, for example with home
collection kits) and give them your number or code to learn the results of
your test.

You are more likely to test positive for (be infected with) HIV if you:

Have ever shared injection drug needles and syringes or "works." Have ever
had sex without a condom with someone who had HIV. Have ever had a sexually
transmitted disease, like chlamydia or gonorrhea. Received a blood
transfusion or a blood clotting factor between 1978 and 1985. Have ever had
sex with someone who has done any of those things

What can I do if the test shows I have HIV?

Although HIV is a very serious infection, many people with HIV and AIDS are
living longer, healthier lives today, thanks to new and effective
treatments. It is very important to make sure you have a doctor who knows
how to treat HIV. If you don?t know which doctor to use, talk with a health
care professional or trained HIV counselor. If you are pregnant or are
planning to become pregnant, this is especially important.

There also are other things you can do for yourself to stay healthy. Here
are a few:

Follow your doctor?s instructions. Keep your appointments. Your doctor may
prescribe medicine for you. Take the medicine just the way he or she tells
you to because taking only some of your medicine gives your HIV infection
more chance to grow. Get immunizations (shots) to prevent infections such as
pneumonia and flu. Your doctor will tell you when to get these shots. If you
smoke or if you use drugs not prescribed by your doctor, quit. Eat healthy
foods. This will help keep you strong, keep your energy and weight up, and
help your body protect itself. Exercise regularly to stay strong and fit.
Get enough sleep and rest.

How can I find out more about HIV and AIDS?

You can call the CDC National AIDS Hotline at 1-800-342-2437 (Spanish/
Español: 1-800-344-7432; TTY access: 1-800-243-7889). The Hotline is staffed
with people trained to answer your questions about HIV and AIDS in a prompt
and confidential manner. Staff at the Hotline can offer you a wide variety
of written materials and put you in touch with organizations in your area
that deal with HIV and AIDS.

On the Internet, you can get information on HIV and AIDS from the CDC
Division of HIV/ AIDS Prevention. Other sources of information are the CDC
National Prevention Information Network, or the HIV/ AIDS Treatment
Information Service.

For more information about HIV or AIDS, call:

CDC National Prevention Information Network
(800) 458-5231
1-301-562-1098 (International)
P.O. Box 6003
Rockville, MD 20849-6003

References

1. Is AIDS manmade?: The Strecker Memorandum. Distributed by The Strecker
Group, Eagle Rock, CA., 1983. 2. Jack Felder. (1989). AIDS: United States
Germs Warfare at its Best with Documents and Proof, 6. 3. Malcolm Turner.
(June 24, 1991). AIDS is Biological Warfare: A Warning to African People,
African Connection, 9. 4. Turner. (1991) and William Campbell Douglass,
(October 17, 1990) Who Murdered Africa, The Challenger, 25. 5. Douglass.
(1990), 25. 6. Turner. (1991), 25. 7. Is AIDS manmade?: The Strecker
Memorandum (1983). 8. William Campbell Douglass, (undated), Who Murdered
Africa: Organization unleashed killer disease on unsuspecting mankind in
biological boondoggle of the century. 9. (Undated). Is AIDS man-made?
Strecker Memorandum claims AIDS was created and deployed by scientists with
an on-going cover-up. Opinion expressed by Dr. Theodore A. Strecker on TV
program ?For the People.? 10. Pearce Wright. (May 1989). Smallpox vaccine
triggered AIDS virus,' Times, 25. 11. Wright. (1989). 12. Wright. (1989).
13. Douglass. (October 17, 1990). 14. Douglass. (1990). 15. Douglass.
(1990). 16. Turner. (1991). 17. AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry
Into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic. (1988). Aries Rising Press. 18.
Felder. (1989). 19. Douglass. (1990). 20. Federal Information Systems
Corporation, Federal News Service. (September 21, 1999). Speech by Pres.
Clinton to the 54th United Nations General Assembly, New York City. 21. 23
Ravi Nessman. (June 6, 2001). AIDS expert for U.N. warns epidemic is likely
to worsen. The Plain Dealer. 22. Angus Shaw. (September 16, 1999). U.N.
agency says AIDS scourge is making Africa a killer field'. The Plain Dealer,
7A. 23. Shaw. (1999). 24. Maggie Farley. (June 26, 2001). U.N. chief to
world: Face facts on AIDS. The Plain Dealer. 25. Donald G. McNeil. (December
16, 1998). AIDS epidemic alters Africa's culture of mourning. The Plain
Dealer. 26. Jim McDermott. (June 23, 1991). Asia-Epicenter of the AIDS
Epidemic. The Washington Post. 27. Jeannie Relly. (February 26, 2000). HIV
infections up in Caribbean. The Plain Dealer. 28. Emma Ross. (November 27,
1998). AIDS toll falling in Europe, study says. The Plain Dealer. 29.
Felder. (1989). 30. Felder. (1989). 31. Felder. (1989). 32. Felder. (1989).
33. Barbara Day. (June 20, 1991). Deadly Tuskegee syphilis study 40 years
later. The Capital Spotlight, 6. 34. Felder. (1989). 35. Felder. (1989). 36.
Felder. (1989). 37. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. (May 16,
1997). Remarks by the President in Apology for Study Done in Tuskegee, 2.

Excerpts of this essay are courtesy of Dr. Kwame Nantambu, an Associate
Professor, Dept. of Pan-African Studies, Kent State University, U.S.A.